Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k singh and · Page 1 of about 8,656 results (0.474 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 14 2001

Chandrika Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-14-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 363, 366 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002CriLJ603

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Singh, A.G.A.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Chandrika has preferred this appeal against his conviction under Sections 323/363/366 and 376, I.P.C. and sentence of 8 months R.I., 4 years R.I. 6 years R.I. and imprisonment for life imposed by Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1999

Ram Shanker Yadav Vs. Regional Manager, South Region, U.P. Forest Corp ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-15-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Service Regulations, 1985 - Regulations 6(4), 16(3) and 16(3)(30)

Reported in : (1999)3UPLBEC2119

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Singh, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. In all these cases common questions of law and facts being involved, by consent of parties it was agreed that those may be taken up together. with permission of the Court, counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2004

Committee of Management, Shiksha Pracharini Sangh and anr. Vs. Assista ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-14-2004

Subject : ElectionTrusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 4, 25, 25(1) and 25(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC99

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Diwakar, Adv. and ;P.K. Singh, S.C.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri H.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri A.S. Diwakar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.2. The Committee of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 08 2003

Guddu Singh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2296

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Singh, A.P.P. and ;B.B. Saxena, Sr. Standing Counsel

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner detenu Guddu Singh has impugned the order dated 3-8-2002, passed by the first respondent Mr. V. K. Varshney,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2004

Committee of Management, Shiksha Pracharini Sangh and anr. Vs. Prescri ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-14-2004

Subject : Election

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 25(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC588

Advocate for Respondent : Y.K. Singh and ;P.K. Singh, Advs. and ;A.S. Diwakar, S.C.

ORDERArun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri H.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri A.S. Diwakar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.2. The Committee of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1999

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Khanij Vikas Nigam Sangharsh Samiti and ors. Vs. S ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21 and 226 ; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 25FFF; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); U.P. Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6H(2)

Reported in : (2000)1UPLBEC588

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Singh, Addl. Adv. General and ;Ashok Kumar Singh, Addl. Standing Counsel

M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to absorb the services of the employees of the U.P. State Mineral Development Corporation Limited on suitable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2003

Shushil Singh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3 and 8; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1854

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Singh, Learned Counsel and ;B.B. Saxena, Sr. S.C.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu Shushil Singh has impugned the order dated 22-9-2002 passed by the first respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2002

Munna Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-2002

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20(B)(2), 23, 35, 42, 42(1), 43, 50 and 57; Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 26

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4274

Advocate for Respondent : D.G.A. and ;S.K. Singh, Adv.

K.K. Misra, J.1. Present appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 12-4-1996 passed by Sri S.K. Ratoori 1st Additional District Judge, Siddharthnagar convicting the sole appellant Munna under Section 20(b)(2) and Section 23 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2004

Hasmat Ali Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-17-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164; Criminal law

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1956

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Singh A.G.A.

K.N. Ojha, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 16-12-2000 passed by learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Basti, in S.T. No. 68 of 2000 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376, IPC and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2003

Jitendra S/O Sri Rajendra Nath Mishra (In Jail) Vs. Dist. Magistrate a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2967

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Singh and ;B.B. Saxena, (C.S.C), Advs.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner detenu Jitendra alias Jeetu Misra has impugned the detention order dated 2-9-2002, passed by Mr. R.S. Verma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial