Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k seshadri · Page 1 of about 153 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 2006

Devaki Antharjanam Vs. Narayanan Namboodiri

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7, 7(1), 8, 9, 10, 13 and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32A; Kerala Land Reforms Act - Sections 125(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2007Ker38; 2006(2)KLT1022

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Seshadri, Adv.

K.T. Sankaran, J.1. The first defendant challenges the final decree for partition. The plaintiff is the husband of the first defendant. The 2nd defendant is their son. The plaintiff and first defendant has a daughter as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2009

Tungabadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh Represented by Its President Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-17-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 442, 446, 446(1), 456, 457, 529A, 530 and 537; Income Tax Act, 1961; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19(7), 19(19), 19(22), 25 to 30, 32, 34, 34(1) and 34(2); State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 46B; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 41; Income Tax Rules - Rules 38 and 52(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 117; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ15

Advocate for Respondent : V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for Ramapriya, Adv. for R5 in OSA 76/09, for R4 in OSA 77/09 and for R3 in OSA 82/09, ;Sathish Parasaran, Adv. for R3 in OSAs 59 and 77/09, ;T.K. Seshadri, Sr. Counsel for P.B.

M. Chockalingam, J.1. All these appeals challenge a common order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in C.A. Nos. 1811 of 2005, 854 of 2006 and 2740 to 2742 of 2007 in C.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2011

M/S.Conveyors India Fabricators P.Ltd, and anr. Vs. Venturetech Soluti ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 (C.P.C.) - Order 7 Rule 11(d) ; Original Side Rules - Order 14 Rule 8 ;

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.T.K.Seshadri; Mr.T.K.Bhaskar, Advs.

1. Challenge in these appeals are the Orders of learned single Judge dated 8.2.2006 in Application No.222 of 2006 in C.S.No.831 of 2005 and Application No.242 of 2006 in C.S.No.833 of 2005 on the file of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 1995

C.R. Priyachandrakumar and Others Vs. Purasawalkam Permanent Fund Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173, 173(2), 179, 193, 195, 257, 260, 264(1), 290, 309 and 309(2)

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas150(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.K. Seshadri and ;M.S. Sampath, Advs.

A.R. Lakshmanan J.1. The applicants in O. A. No. 708 of 1994 are the plaintiffs in the suit. The prayer in the suit is as follows : (a) For a declaration that the notice dated June...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2002

Kasturi and Sons Ltd. Vs. F.D. Stewart Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-04-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446(2) and 458A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : [2003]113CompCas438(Mad); [2004]54SCL272(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The official liquidator has filed this application seeking for a direction to the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 1,47,797.60 being the amount due with interest of Rs. 1,53,298.65 from August 30,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2005

Perinigottukara Namboodiri Yogakshema Sabha Vs. Sreelatha

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-21-2005

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 3(1), 11(1), 11(2) and 20; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Rules, 1965 - Rules 14 and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24, 24(1) and 25; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 21 and 21A; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Civil Courts Act

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT480

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Seshadri, Adv.

ORDERPius C. Kuriakose, J.1. This Transfer Petition seeks transfer of a petition for eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 presently pending before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam, over...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2009

Scanwell Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Blaiklock Compass World Trans ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 454(5); Madras High Court Original Side Rules - Order 36, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas491(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.K. Seshadri, Sr. Counsel for ;Srinath Sridevan, Adv. for R1, ;Latha, Adv. for Official Liquidator-R2 and ;C.A. Diwhan Aryaraj, Adv. for R4 and ;R. Saravanakumar, Adv. for RR6 and 8

ORDERM. Chockalingam, J.1. When these appeals were taken up for enquiry, the learned Senior Counsel Mr. T.K. Seshadri appearing for the first respondent raised a question as to the maintainability of the appeals.2. On the point...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2002

Yokogawa Blue Star Ltd. Vs. Soffia Software Ltd. (Formerly Soffia Info ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 10, 433 and 434

Reported in : [2004]119CompCas929(Mad); [2004]55SCL340(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.K. Seshadri, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The petitioning creditor has filed the above company petition under Sections 433(e), 434(1)(a) and 439(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, for winding up of the respondent-company.2. In the company petition, it is stated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2002

Gimpex Minerals Pvt. Ltd., Madras Vs. State Bank of India, Overseas Br ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 145

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas312(Mad); (2002)3MLJ326

Advocate for Respondent : Nalini Chidambaram, Senior Counsel for ;Silambanan, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 159 of 1994, ;T.K. Seshadri, Adv. in O.S.A. No. 107/1994 and ;P. Sukumar, Adv.

K. Raviraja Pandian,J.1. The defendants No.1 and 2, who suffered a decree, at the hands of the learned Single Judge of this Court in a suit filed by the first respondent herein by the decree and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2007

i.K. Lodi Vs. the Appellate Authority Under Tamil Nadu Shops and Estab ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Bharat Overseas Bank Limited Officers Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2007)IILLJ45Mad

Advocate for Respondent : T.K. Seshadri, Sr. Counsel for ;T.K. Baskar, Adv. for R-2 and ;K. Elango, Special Government Pleader for R-1

P. Sathasivam, J.1.The above Writ Appeal is directed against the Order of the learned single Judge, dated 01.04.2003, passed in W.P. No. 9537 of 1997, in and by which, the learned Judge set aside the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial