Advanced Search Results

Advocate Manish Kumar Khanna Vs. The Hon???ble Delhi High Court and Or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. Akshay Makhija, Mr. Rahul Jain, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Ms. Madhavi Khare, Mr. Ashish Dixit

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.442/2014, CMs No.1394/2014 (for direction)& 1176/2015 ADVOCATE MANISH KUMAR KHANNA Through: Petitioner in person. .... Petitioner Versus THE...

Ajai Kumar Pathak Vs. Regional Institute of Technology and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Laws

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR577(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta and; V. Shivnath, Advs.

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. The writ petition was preferred by petitioner challenging the appointment of 4th respondent, Mr. Sanjay made vide letter No. RIT(E)/ 1522/2000 dated 28.2.2000 whereby he was appointed as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical...

Dr. Nanda Ghosh Vs. Ranchi University and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Jharkhand State University (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR435(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this case the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to immediately implement the order and direction of this Court passed on 16.12.1999 in CWJC No....

Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Nitin K. Mehta

1. The Petitioner is a foreign company based in Canada and has set up a project office in India with the permission of Reserve Bank of India. The Petitioner is subject to income tax in India...

Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Nitin K. Mehta

1. The Petitioner is a foreign company based in Canada and has set up a project office in India with the permission of Reserve Bank of India. The Petitioner is subject to income tax in India...

The Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation Vs. Cherukattil Gopalan and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7 and 16(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 258(1)

Reported in : AIR1971SC1725; 1971CriLJ1277; (1971)2SCC322; [1971]SuppSCR721

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Nagaraja, ; S.K. Mehta and ; K.L. Mehta, Advs.

Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, by the Food Inspector, Calicut Corporation, is directed against the judgment and order dated June 26, 1968 of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 1968...

Gulshan Kumar and ors Vs. Sat NaraIn Tulsian (Deceased) Through Lrs.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Sukant Vikram, Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Madan Gera, Mr. Aman Vachher

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h December, 2013 % + RFA3882011 GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. G.L. Rawal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Amarjeet Singh...

Chandreshwar Prasad Singh Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR200(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. H.K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider...

Ratnesh Kumar Verma Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Forest Rules

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR48(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta, SC-1,; Rajiv Anand and; Rupesh Singh, Ad

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rupesh Kumar Singh, learned JC to Mr. A.K. Mehta, SC-I for the State of Jharkhand.2. The petitioner in the instant case has...

Bijay Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. Ranchi University and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 309

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR127(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. N.N. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the office...