Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k kapoor · Page 1 of about 1,240 results (0.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 08 2005

Amar @ Bahadur Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 344, 363, 366, 366A, 368, 372, 373, 376 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164 and 428

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT267; 2005(82)DRJ197

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil K. Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor

R.C. Jain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8th October, 2004 and order dated 15th October, 2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellant herein Amar @ Bahadur has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1994

Nafe Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-04-1994

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 2(3) and 2(5)

Reported in : (1994)108PLR333

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, AAG and; Anil Rathee, Adv.

A.P. Chowdhri, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that five petitioners who are proprietors in Panna Kalian at village Sandal Kalan, Tehsil and District Sonepat, instituted a suit for permanent injunction in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2007

Shri Rajesh Bhardwaj Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-29-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 313, 406, 498A and 506

Reported in : 2008(101)DRJ380

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil K. Kapoor, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. This is an application filed by the appellant under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking suspension of his substantive sentence during the pendency of the appeal in this Court.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 2003

Vinod Kumar Sud and anr. Vs. Bansi Lal Narinder Kumar Through Its Prop ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-19-2003

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (2004)136PLR593

Advocate for Respondent : Tanu Bedi for; S.K. Kapoor, Advs.

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Ms. Bedi has filed amended explanation of Dr. S.K. Kapoor. The same is taken on record.After having gone through the amended explanation, we deem it proper to accept the same. Consequently, notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2000

Shashi Bala Anand Vs. Prem Pal Anand

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)950; 85(2000)DLT640; 2000(54)DRJ155

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. D.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv. and ; Mr. F. Hassan, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The respondent-husband filed matrimonial case against the appellant wife for divorce on the ground of cruelty. It is not necessary to set out the pleadings as the learned Addl. District Judge had noticed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2005

Ram Parshad Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Gold (Control) Act - Sections 80(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 122, 427 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 395, 420, 489, 489A, 489B, 489C and 489D

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT129; 2006(86)DRJ224

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil K. Kapoor, Adv.

ORDERJ.P. Singh, J.1. This application under Section 427 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been moved for directions to run the sentences in two cases concurrently. Regular criminal appeal against the impugned judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2003

C.E.S.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-19-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147, 148, 160, 161, 163, 163(1), 163(2), 195 and 246(1)

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Cal)124,[2003]263ITR402(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, ;Dipak Shome and ;Joydeb Chandra Saha, Advs.

D.K. SETH, J. :Facts1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt. 10th Sept., 2001, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No. 598 of 2001, dismissing the writ petition on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2009

Chemithon Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Department of Atomic Ener ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-07-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 25(2), 39, 52(1), 52(2), 57, 65 and 125; ;Urban Lands (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Section 20; ;Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959; ;Patent Rules, 2003 - Rule 4 and 4(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 and 141; ;Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226(1), 226(2) and 227

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, Sr. Adv., ;Ranjan Bachawat, ;Ravi Kapoor, ;Prithviraj Sinha and ;Subhankar Chakraborty, Adv.

Surinder Singh Nijjar, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th February, 2009 rendered in W.P. No. 477(w) of 2009. By the aforesaid judgment, the Learned Single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2003

Berger Paints India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-24-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(Cal)150,[2004]266ITR462(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kapoor, Adv.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. On December 2, 2003, I heard the matter in the absence of the learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. S.K. Kapoor, and passed an order directing to file affidavits and to continue interim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1990

Rajesh Chaudhary Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority, Through Its ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1990

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 226 and 227

Reported in : (1990)98PLR167

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Kapoor, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERK.P. Bhandari, J. 1. This writ petition is directed to challenge a part of the Memo No A-14-89/10290-91, dated 19-4-1989 issued by the Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Mani Majra (Union Territory), Chandigarh, in so...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial