Advanced Search Results
Dinkar Shripad Honavar Vs. Union of India and ors
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-17-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]253ITR328(MP)
A. K. Gohil J., Heard on I. A. No. 1892 of 2001 an application for taking a fixed date.After a perusal of the file it is clear that in this case every time this court is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-15-2006
Criminal
2006(4)MPLJ464
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. The petitioners, who are husband, brothers-in-law, in-laws and sister-in-law of the respondent No. 2 wife, have filed this petition under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 21-3-2006 and for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamta Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-01-2006
Criminal
2007CriLJ695
Shri. S.S. Rajput
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. This is complainant's revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment of acquittal dated 18-12-1998 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha in Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramdayal and anr. Vs. Kailash Lodhi and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-14-2006
Motor Vehicles
2008ACJ526
A.K. Gohil, J.1. Claimants have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award dated 25-6-2003 passed by First Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ashoknagar, in claim Case No. 22/2003, where by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Traders and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-07-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227
2003(4)MPHT546
P.V. Bhagwat, Adv.
ORDERA.K. Gohil, Adv.1. Petitioners, who are defendants in Original Civil Suit No. 11-B/2002, have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24-12-2002, by which the Trial Court while...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecision Technofab and Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and or ...
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-16-2005
Constitution
Madhya Pradesh Uchh-Nyayalaya (Letters Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981 - Sections 1, 2 and 2(1); Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 108; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rules 10, 11 and 12; Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(1)MPHT246; 2004(3)MPLJ541
S.K. Yadav, Dy. Adv. General for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and ;A.K. De, Adv. for the Respondent No. 6
Dipak Misra, J.1. What would have been a matter of interesting debate as regards expressing an opinion because of the difference between two of our esteemed peers that had emerged relating to grant of State largess...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarafraj Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-12-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8 and 60
2004(3)MPHT122
Deepak Shrivastava, Govt. Adv.
A.K. Gohil, J.1. Appellant stands convicted under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code ('Code' for short) and sentenced to life imprisonment in S.T. No. 117/94 vide judgment dated 26-3-96 by I ASJ, Vidisha, Camp Sironj.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamlal Vyas Vs. Inderchand JaIn and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-20-2007
Contempt of Court
AIR2008MP15; 2007(4)MPHT366
Shri. Ashok Vailankar
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Petitioner has filed two contempt petitions in which Shri Ashok Vailankar is appearing as an Advocate/Lawyer on behalf of petitioner. There was an objection that he cannot appear, act or plead in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPonnaganti Kondaiah Vs. Mallela Subba Rao (Died) Per Lrs and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-28-2003
Civil
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69, 69(1), 69(2) and 69(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 67; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100
2004(5)ALT505
K. Suresh Reddy, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful defendant in O.S.No. 1223/78 on the file of V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur, aggrieved by the reversing Judgment and decree made in A.S.No. 28/82 on the file of III Additional District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamid Khan Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-30-1996
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47 and 226
AIR1997MP191; 1997(1)MPLJ587
R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G., ;A.K. Gohil, Adv. for Union of India and ;S.K. Seth and ;V.S. Shroti, Advs.
A.K. Mathur, C.J. 1. This is a public interest litigation filed by one Hamid Khan, who is a practising Advocate of Mandla for the apathy of the State Government, or rather a gross negligence on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »