Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k ganguli · Page 1 of about 1,258 results (0.173 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 1994

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995Supp(2)SCC717

M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J. and; S. Mohan, J.1. We have heard Shri A.K. Ganguli, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Shri Gobind Dass, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents. Leave granted.2. These petitions arise out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 1987

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Industrial Gases Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-1987

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC290

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. A.K. Ganguli

A.P. Sen and; V. Balakrishnan Eradi, JJ.1. After hearing Shri V.N. Kowa, learned Counsel for the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Shri A.K. Ganguli, learned Counsel appearing for the Industrial Gases Ltd., we feel that this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2002

Kaziranga Tobaco Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-17-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguly, K.N. Choudhury, B. Sarma and A. Baruah, Advs.

P.G. Agarwal, J.1. This batch of 23 writ petitions are disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. We have heard Shri Ashok Desai, Sr. Advocate, Shri P.K. Goswami, Sr. Advocate, Shri G.N. Sahewalla, Sr. Advocate,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 17 2003

Food Corporation of India Vs. Indian Council of Arbitration and ors. E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Indian Council of Arbitration Rules - Rules 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14 to 19, 20 to 22 and 37; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6) and 16

Reported in : AIR2003SC3011; 2003(2)ARBLR692(SC); (2003)4CompLJ290(SC); 2003(3)CTC230; [2003(3)JCR170(SC)]; JT2003(5)SC480; 2003(5)SCALE276; (2003)6SCC564; [2003]46SCL351(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv., ; A.T. Patra and ; Nipun Malhotra

D. Raju, J.1. Special leave granted. These appeals are dealt with together since they involve identical questions for consideration on almost similar set of faces.2. The appellants are the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2010

State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Misrilall JaIn and Sons and anr. Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2010

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 13(2), 15, 15(1A) and 17; ;Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(1) and 31; ;Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 - Rule 29(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 162; ;Mines and Minerals Development Regulation

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguly,; C.S. Vaidyanathan,; G.C. Bharuka,;

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. In this group of 52 appeals by special leave, 46 are directed against the common judgment dated May 7, 2007 passed by the High of Jharkhand disposing of 46 writ petitions....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1999

Smt. Sunanda Choudhari Vs. District Inspectress of Schools, Varanasi a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-22-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Commission Act, 1982 - Sections 21B

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1790; (1999)2UPLBEC1065

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.,;P.K. Ganguly,;A.K. Yadav and;S.P. Singh, Advs.

Aloke Chakrabarti, J. 1. The dispute herein is relating to post of Principal in Bipin Bihari Chakravarty Inter College, Ramapura, Varanasi.2. The case made out in the present writ petition in substance is that the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1989

Mafatlal Fine Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Cen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 49A, 49A(1) and 49A(2)

Reported in : AIR1989SC784; 1989(20)ECC7; 1989(23)LC500(SC); 1989(40)ELT218(SC); JT1989(1)SC160; (1989)2SCC446; [1989]1SCR204; 1989(1)LC374(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv., ; Sushma Suri and ; K. Swami, Advs

M.N. Venkatachaliah, J.1. These two appeals under Section 35-L of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (Act) by Messrs Mafatlal Fine Spinning & ., arise out of and are directed against the common appellate-order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1994

K. Ashok Reddy Vs. the Government of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-1994

Subject : constitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 222

Reported in : AIR1994SC1207; JT1994(1)SC401; 1994(1)SCALE377; (1994)2SCC303; [1994]1SCR662; 1994(2)LC61(SC); (1994)1UPLBEC434

Advocate for Respondent : Milan K. Banerjee, Attorney General, ; A.K. Ganguli, ; A. Subh

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. These matters are a sequel to the decision by a nine-Judge Bench in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Ors. v. Union of India, : AIR1994SC268 (hereinafter called the 'Judges Case-H'), and relate to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2005

R. Murali and ors. Vs. Kanyaka P. Devasthanam and Charities and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2005

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 93; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 5, 6, 64, 106 and 107; Constitution of India - Articles 25 and 26

Reported in : AIR2005SC3096; 2005(5)ALD107(SC); 2005(4)AWC3194(SC); 2005(4)CTC234; [2005(4)JCR103(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC381; (2005)4MLJ52(SC); (2005)6SCC166

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Adv. and ; T. Harish Kumar, Adv.

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Leave to file appeal is granted.2. Counsel for the parties are heard on the merits of the appeal.3. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned order of the Division Bench of the High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 2002

i.T.C. Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-26-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1986

Reported in : 2003(85)ECC17; 2002(146)ELT508(SC); JT2002(9)SC572; (2003)1SCC634

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Adv., ; Nisha Bagchi, ; K.C. Kaushik an

1. The appellant-assessee is common in these appeals which relate to the same period, namely, 1986 to 1988, but arise out of orders of different Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunals (for short, 'the Tribunal')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial