Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k choudhary · Page 1 of about 409 results (0.214 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 2006

G.L. Dalmia and ors. Vs. Bateli Tea Company Limited,

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2007)1CompLJ450

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. U.K. Choudhary

1. In this order, I am considering three petitions CP Nos.97, 98 and 99 of 2005 together, as in all the three respondent companies, same set of family members hold shares and the reliefs sought for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1990

Uman Sing Gurung and anr. Vs. Seva Ram Dutta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-1990

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.K. Choudhary

Jagat Mohan Srivastava, J.1. This is claimants' appeal against the judgment and award dated 21.11,1983 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Kamrup), Gauhati.2. The claimants who are the parents had Claimed compensation for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1990

Uman Singh Gurung and anr. Vs. Seva Ram Dutta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-1990

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Choudhary and P.C. Gayan, Advs.

Jagat Mohan Srivastava, J.1. This is claimants' appeal against the judgment and award dated 21.11.1983 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Kamrup), Gauhati.2. The claimants who are the parents had claimed compensation for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 02 2003

S.V. Industries Vs. Secretary, Engineering Majdoor Sangh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25M(5), 33(1) and 33C(1)

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR1018]; 2003(1)MPHT478

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Choudhary, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The petitioner seeks to question the legality of the Recovery Certificate dated 20-2-2002 (Annexure P-2) issued by Upper Labour Commissioner, Indore, for Rs. 6,20,460/- by invoking the provisions of Section 33C(1) of Industrial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2006

Rajkumar Devraj and Rajkumari Vs. Jai Mahal Hotels (Private)

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2006)134CompCas405

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. U.K. Choudhary

1. Whether a petition filed by the children of a deceased shareholder, who have applied for grant of succession certificate in their favour, which application is reportedly under challenge, deserved to be dismissed at the preliminary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

M/S Shriram Pistons & Rings Ltd vs.rachna Dewan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. N.K. Choudhary

$~26 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4652015 M/S SHRIRAM PISTONS & RINGS LTD Through : Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus RACHNA DEWAN ..... Respondent Through :Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2005

Gahalaut and Choudhary Steel Private Ltd. Vs. Bihar State Financial Co ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-03-2005

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : IV(2005)BC227; [2005(4)JCR283(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta,; Ashok Yadav and; P.K. Choudhary, Advs.

R.K. Merathia, J.Heard Mr. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents and accordingly this case is being disposed of at the admission stage.1. In substance, petitioner has challenged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2004

Anil N. Bugde Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Department of General A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Indian Police Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 - Rule 9; Pay Rules

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR592; [2004(102)FLR878]; 2004(3)MhLj254

Advocate for Respondent : G.E. Vashanvati, Adv. General, ;Roi Rodrigues, Special Counsel, ;R.M. Rathe, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No. 1, ;G.E. Vahanvati, Adv. General, ; ;B.R. Patil, Public Procecutor, for re

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. All these petitions have been filed in public interest litigation making grievance against transferring Dr. Parwinder Singh Pasricha. Commissioner of Police, Mumbai (Respondent No. 5 in PIL No. 20 of 2004), and appointing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2016

Tushar Gajanan Savlajkar and Others Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. These two petitions raise common issues of law and facts, the prayers are also similar therefore, both the petitions are being adjudicated by this common judgment. 2. For the sake of convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2017

Chandra Gupta Kumar and Ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors. Etc ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2795-2797 OF2017CHANDRA GUPTA KUMAR AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS Appellant(s) STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2798-2800 OF2017WITH...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial