Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k choudhary · Page 1 of about 396 results (0.134 seconds)

Aug 17 1990

Uman Singh Gurung and anr. Vs. Seva Ram Dutta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-1990

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Choudhary and P.C. Gayan, Advs.

Jagat Mohan Srivastava, J.1. This is claimants' appeal against the judgment and award dated 21.11.1983 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Kamrup), Gauhati.2. The claimants who are the parents had claimed compensation for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2003

S.V. Industries Vs. Secretary, Engineering Majdoor Sangh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25M(5), 33(1) and 33C(1)

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR1018]; 2003(1)MPHT478

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Choudhary, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. The petitioner seeks to question the legality of the Recovery Certificate dated 20-2-2002 (Annexure P-2) issued by Upper Labour Commissioner, Indore, for Rs. 6,20,460/- by invoking the provisions of Section 33C(1) of Industrial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2005

Gahalaut and Choudhary Steel Private Ltd. Vs. Bihar State Financial Co ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-03-2005

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : IV(2005)BC227; [2005(4)JCR283(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Mehta,; Ashok Yadav and; P.K. Choudhary, Advs.

R.K. Merathia, J.Heard Mr. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents and accordingly this case is being disposed of at the admission stage.1. In substance, petitioner has challenged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Mar 10 2004

Anil N. Bugde Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Department of General A ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Indian Police Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 - Rule 9; Pay Rules

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR592; [2004(102)FLR878]; 2004(3)MhLj254

Advocate for Respondent : G.E. Vashanvati, Adv. General, ;Roi Rodrigues, Special Counsel, ;R.M. Rathe, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No. 1, ;G.E. Vahanvati, Adv. General, ; ;B.R. Patil, Public Procecutor, for re

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. All these petitions have been filed in public interest litigation making grievance against transferring Dr. Parwinder Singh Pasricha. Commissioner of Police, Mumbai (Respondent No. 5 in PIL No. 20 of 2004), and appointing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2016

Tushar Gajanan Savlajkar and Others Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. These two petitions raise common issues of law and facts, the prayers are also similar therefore, both the petitions are being adjudicated by this common judgment. 2. For the sake of convenience,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2017

Om Prakash vs.central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2017