Advanced Search Results

Trimbakrao Mugutrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 28, 29, 29(1) and 29(2); Civil Procedire Code - Sections 36(4) and 80; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Distribution of Surplus Land and (Amendment) Rules, 1975 - Rule 12; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) (Distribution of Surplus Land) and (Amendment) Rules, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR467

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Ahirkar, A.G.P.

Rohee K.J., J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. The petitioner has moved the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction...

Manohar S/O Mahadeo Dande Vs. Manohar S/O Bhaskar Bhave

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Respondent : Shri S. S. Pandit, Adv.

1) Rule with the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2) The above petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 14/06/2011 passed...

Siddhi Foods and Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs (A)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(114)ELT933Tri(Mum.)bai

1. When this application seeking stay came up for hearing, it appeared that the issue being settled, the main appeal itself could be taken up for disposal. Both sides agreeing, this was done, after granting waiver...

Nishiland Park Limited Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2000)(115)ELT690Tri(Mum.)bai

1. After hearing Shri J.C. Patel for the applicants and Shri B.K.Choube for the revenue, it appeared that the main appeal itself could be taken up for disposal. This was done by granting waiver of pre-deposit...

Essel Packaging Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(119)ELT660Tri(Mum.)bai

1. On hearing Dr. D.M. Mishra for the applicants and Shri B.K. Choube for the Revenue. It appeared that at this stage itself the main appeal could be taken up for consideration this was done by...

Anand Vithoba Lohkare and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 243, 251, 252 and 537; Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act - Sections 4, 5 and 12;

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR288; 2000BomCR(Cri)288; 1999CriLJ2857; 1999(2)MhLj435

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Deshpande, A.P.P.

ORDERD.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri A.K. Choube, the learned Counsel for the applicants and Shri V.M. Deshpande, the learned A.P.P. for the non-applicant. 2. This criminal revision application is directed against the order dated 14-7-1995 passed...

Ratiram Singh Yadav Vs. Principal, Government Polytechnic, Harda and a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 37; Madhya Pradesh Recognised Examination Act, 1937 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Recognised Examination Rules - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1990MP129; 1989MPLJ712

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Naik, Dy. Adv. General

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The order passed in this petition shall also govern the disposal of M. P. No. 411 / 88 (Omshankar Chanderi and Ors. v. Madhya Pradesh Technical Education Board, through its Secretary and another).2....

Commissioner of Cus. (P) Vs. Alliance Exports

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)LC245Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This application was argued by Shri B.K. Choube, SDR for the Revenue and Shri R.S. Dinkar advocate for the respondent.2. The respondent imported tyres and declared the value thereof at Rs. 1425/- per M.T. Show...

Dilip Bidesh and ors. Vs. Shivgopal Madangopal Chaurasia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1887 - Sections 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 18(5), 20, 20A, 20(1), 24 to 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96 to 112 and 115; Slum Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Limitation Act 1963 - Sections 4, 5 and 12; Provincial Small Causes Courts and Presidency Small Causes Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 11, 11(2) and 20; Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 18(5) and 20; Karnataka Rent Control Act - Sections 48(6) and 50; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ,

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR463; 2005(6)BomCR207; 2005(4)MhLj967

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Choube, Adv.

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. In this Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, challenge is to the judgment dated 20-3-2003 delivered by Second Additional District Judge, Nagpur in R.C.A. 574/2001 in an appeal under...

Gunwant Mahadeorao Deshmukh Vs. Bapurao S/O Krishnarao Shinde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Madhya Pradesh Bhudan Yagna Act, 1953 - Sections 17, 18 and 19

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR253; 2002(3)BomCR286

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bhide, Adv. for respondent No. 5, ;Ramesh Darda, Adv. for respondents 6 to 11 and ;A.K. Choube, Adv. for 1-A, 3 and 5

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard learned Advocate for the appellant and respondents.2. This second appeal is filed by the original plaintiff. The substantial question of law that was formulated by this Court at the time of admission...