Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k bhatt · Page 1 of about 210 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 16 2004

Wazibullah and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395, 396 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1004

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Bhatt, A.G.A.

M.C. Jain, J.1. This appeal was filed by three appellants, namely, (1) Wazibullah, (ii) Santraj and (iii) Mangar against judgment and order dated 22-9-1980 passed by Sri D. P. Srivastava, the then V Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2004

Sipector Alias Inspector Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2005CriLJ343

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Bhatt, AGA

M.C. Jain, J.1. The appeal has been preferred by one Sipector alias Inspector Kachhi against the judgment and order dated 2-3-1981 passed by Sri M. P. Singh I, the then V Additional Sessions Judge, Etah in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2011

Anita Mehra Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-13-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471, 120- B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482

1. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts leading to filing of the present petition(s) are that the marriage of Anita Mehra, the petitioner in Crl.M.C. o.2255/2003, and Satish Mehra, the respondent No.2 in Crl.Revision Petition No.304/2003,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 25 2017

The Cpio, Department of Personnel and Training vs.central Information ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-25-2017

Subject : Right to Information

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7360/2017 THE CPIO, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Rahul versus Sharma and Mr C.K....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2005

State of Gujarat Vs. Natwar Harchandji Thakor

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 40, 41, 46, 46A, 65, 66, 66(1), 85, 85(1), 85(1)(1), 85(1)(3) and 85(3); Bombay Police Act - Sections 110, 117 and 135; Prevention of Corruption Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16(1); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 27; Employees' Provident Fund Act; Madras Prohibition Act - Sections 4(1); Evidence Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2), 240(2), 241, 248(2), 251, 252, 255(2), 262, 265A to 265K, 325, 354(3), 354(4), 360, 361, 465 and 537; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 243; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1969; Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2957; (2005)1GLR709

Advocate for Respondent : Jayshree C. Bhatt,; Shilpa J. Unwalla,; Hina Desai,

J.N. Bhatt, J.Prelude (Focal Point)Let us at the very outset, evidently record, remember, and recollect that ;'A civilisation is judged by the way it treats its criminals.'1. In this group of criminal appeals, specially assigned to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2017

Nafe Singh Rajput vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Umesh Sharma, Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Mr. Ajay Di, Ms. Ishita Baruah, Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Mr. M.C. Tyagi

$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:11. 05.2017 + W.P. (C) 7073/2013, CM APPL.15268/2013, 4067, 4068, 4967 & 40280/2016 NAFE SINGH RAJPUT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2006

Saiyed Salim Saiyed HussaIn Saiyed Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-18-2006

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 21, 29, 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 50, 52, 54, 55 and 57; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 157, 313, 374 and 464

Reported in : (2007)1GLR834

Advocate for Respondent : K.T. Dave, Addl. Public Prosecutor

A.M. Kapadia, J.1. The appellant ('the accused' for short) was tried by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 13, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 255 of 1999 for commission of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2017

Kusum Sharma vs.mahinder Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2017

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Mr. Sunil Mittal, Mr. Dhruv Grover, Ms. Anu Narula

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. h May, 2017 FAO3691996 & CM150832014 KUSUM SHARMA Through: None. ..... Appellant versus MAHINDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2017

Ashit Kumar Mishra vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h May, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7219/2016 & CM Nos. 29725/2016, 29726/2016 ........ Petitioner Versus Puneet Kumar, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2026

Sandeep Pathak & Ors. vs Lalita Tiwari

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 09th December, 2025 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026+ CRL.M.C. 297/2021, CRL.M.A. 1531/2021 & CRL.M.A.1. SH. SANDEEP PATHAK2. SH. JAYANT PATHAK3. MS. HEMLATA PATHAKAll R/o...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial