Advanced Search Results

Smt. Varijakshi Bhat W/O Late Gopalakrishna Bhat Vs. the State of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 70, 101 and 108; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 89 and 90; Constitution of India - Article 227; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 - Rules 34, 34(1), 34(2), 34(3), 38, 38(1), 38(2), 38(3), 38(4) and 38(5); Uttar pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 285

Reported in : 2009(4)KarLJ419; AIR2009NOC1221; 2009(2)AIRKarR326

Advocate for Respondent : H.K. Basavaraj, HCGP for R1-R4, ;S.K. Acharya, Adv. for R5 and ;S.P. Shankar, Sr. Counsel for S.P.S. Associates for R6-R8

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This writ petition by the legal heir of a Judgment Debtor whose property was brought to public auction sale in execution of an Award that the Judgment Debtor had suffered under Section...

Indian Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. and anr. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144; Labour Law; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1958SC130; (1958)ILLJ260SC

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. K. Acharya

S.K. Das, J. 1. These four appeals by special leave arise out of certain labour disputes between the employer, Messrs. Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited and the Indian Standard Wagon Company Limited, Burnpur, Asansol (hereinafter...

M. Muniyappa Vs. Kempamma and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. S.K.Acharya, Sri. P.Karunakar, Sri. Anjaiah

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 227 of the Constitution of india Praying to set aside the Order Dated 23.09.2016 Passed by The Learned Sr. Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli in O.S.853/2008 on I.A.31...

Smt. Damayanti Dei Vs. Sri Pabitra Mohan Srichandan

Court : Orissa

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12(1), 13 and 13(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 494; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 124

Reported in : AIR2005Ori164; 99(2005)CLT481; II(2005)DMC83

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Acharya, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. Dash, Learned Counsel for the appellant, and Mr. Acharya, Learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The Civil Appeal stands disposed of in the following manner:Respondent filed Civil Proceeding No. 186 of 1997 before the...

Rajkishore Dalai Vs. Kalandi Pradhan and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Orissa Grama Panchayat Act, 1964 - Sections 25(1) and 31; ;Limitation Act - Sections 5; ;Orissa Grama Panchayats (Amendment) Act, 1994; ;Haryana Panchayati Raj Act - Sections 175(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 243G

Reported in : 100(2005)CLT351

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Acharya and; J.K. Mishra, Advs.

A.K. Parichha, J.1. In this Writ Petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 23.4.2004 passed by the Learned Addl. District Judge, Nayagarh in Election Misc. Appeal No. 1 of 2004 affirming the order dated 16.1.2004...

Maniben Wd/O. Mohanbhai Halabhai Parmar Vs. Manshukhlal Jaishankar Dav ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : (2003)3GLR123

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Acharya, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside the order dated 13-11-1995 passed by learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge (S.D.), Palanpur,...

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm LaxminaraIn Harnarain

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1); Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 74C; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152, 160 and 161; Booking of Goods Traffic Rules - Rules 32, 45 and 47

Reported in : AIR1963Raj162

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Bhargava and; B.K. Acharya, Advs.

Chhangani, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants Union of India through the General Manager, Northern and Western Railways, against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Alwar, dated the 4th July, 1955, decreeing...

Joseph Albert Lewis S/O Thimothy Lewis Vs. Michael Roque Lewis S/O Thi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 63; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(12), 2(17), 21, 24, 48A, 48A(4), 48A(5), 48A(5A), 61 and 77; Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 64

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ599; ILR2007(4)Kar4174; 2007(5)AIRKarR617; AIR2007NOC2681

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Nataraj, Adv. for ;S.K. Acharya, Adv. for R4

A.S. Bopanna, J.1. The appellant is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 22/1998. The respondents herein were also the respondents in the suit with the same rank. The plaintiff had initially filed a petition seeking probate of...

Narayan Sahoo Vs. Jabdu Nanda and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438

Reported in : 87(1999)CLT58; 1999(I)OLR359

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Dhal, A.K. Acharya, D.K. Das (for opp. party Nos. 1 and 2) and Bijan Ray, C. Choudhury, D. Chhotray, S. Patnaik and S. Mohanty (for opp. party No. 3)

A. Pasayat, J.1. Taking serious view of the conduct displayed by the opposite parties and doubting correctness of the orders passed by some learned Judges permitting surrender before the learned Sessions Judge directly without first surrendering...

Rachel Sukumari Vs. Samuel Rajashekar Mathias and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 63; Evidence Act - Sections 68; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2260; 2005(5)KarLJ528

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Nataraj, Adv. for Caveator-R. No. 1 and ;S.K. Acharya, Adv. for R. No. 3

Chidananda Ullal, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant had challenged the order passed by the Trial Court, granting the Letter of Administration in favour of the respondent-plaintiff.2. I heard the learned Counsel for the appellant, Sri...