Advanced Search Results

Bajirao Jaisingrao Ghadage Vs. Rajaram Yeshwant Chougule and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(10A), 2(18), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 27, 27(1), 30, 31, 31(1), 31(3), 32, 32 to 32E, 32F, 32F(1) and 32G to 32R; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1955; Tenancy and Agricultural Land Laws (Amendment) Act, 1969

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR669; 2005(5)BomCR674; 2005(3)MhLj1082

Advocate for Respondent : A.A. Kumbhakoni, Adv.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This Common Judgment will dispose of all the companion writ petitions, for the question involved is common between the parties. The respondent in the respective writ petition claim to be permanent tenants in...

A.R. Khan Construwell Company Vs. Youth Education and Welfare Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 36 and 36(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Public Trusts Rules - Rule 24

Reported in : AIR2005Bom123

Advocate for Respondent : M.H. Shah and ;V.R. Manohar, Sr. Counsels, ;R.V. More, ;S.A. Sawant, ;V.A. Gangal, ;Harshad Deshpande, ;Amit Sakalikar, ;Ulhas Naik and ;Amit Karande, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. These writ petitions have been filed against the common order dated 26th June, 2003 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nasik, whereby Application No. 21 of 2002 taken out by Youth Education and...

Mukund Shivaram Patil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 7, 7(2), 15, 22A and 22A(4); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 5, 12, 14, 29 and 29(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 150(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue (Register of Mutations) Rules - Rules 14 and 24; Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18 and 19; Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 35 and 35(3); Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR700; (2001)4BOMLR418; 2001(4)MhLj656

Advocate for Respondent : A.H. Palekar, Additional Government Pleader

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. The present writ petition arises out of an order passed by the Deputy Collector (Acquisition), Thane, Forest (Private Forests) Division, dated 28th July, 1979, in an enquiry held under section 22A of...

Shital Sudhir Sonavle Vs. Group Gram Panchayat and 11 ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 35, 35(1), 35(3) and 176; Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959 - Rule 17; Bombay Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-sarpanch (No. Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR19; 2003(4)BomCR31; 2003(3)MhLj565

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Borulkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and 7 to 9 and ;Arun H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 10 to 12

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this petition, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 31.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Collector, Raigad and also the subsequent order dated 30.12.2002 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner in an...

Krishnakumar Bangera Vs. Returning Officer, Mogaveera Co-operative Ban ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 73(1), 73FFF and 73FF(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR690; 2005(1)BomCR695; 2005(1)MhLj393

Advocate for Respondent : A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and ;S.V. Borkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. Mr. Palekar, A.G.P. waives notice for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and Mr. Borkar for respondent No. 3....

Deshbhakta Ratnappa Kumbhar Panchganga Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 138

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR68; 2004(2)MhLj744

Advocate for Respondent : P.H. Palekar, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No. 1 and ;Rajan Dharmadhikari, ;D.B. Sawant and ;Shailesh Dalvi, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Petition, the petitioners M/s Deshbhakta Ratnappa Kumbhar Panchganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. are challenging the order passed by the respondent No. 1 the Hon'ble Minister for State Excise. Government of Maharashtra...

Sangli Zilha Shikshan Vikas Mandal and anr. Vs. Shankar Baburao Mali a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR105; 2008(1)BomCR309; 2008(1)MhLj764

Advocate for Respondent : A.H. Palekar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;R.M. Patne, AGP for Respondent No. 2

Mhatre Nishita, J.1. The petition challenges the order of the School Tribunal dated 9.12.1997 in Appeal No. 232 of 1996. By this order, the Tribunal has held that the action of the petitioners declaring that respondent...

Aasma Abdul Majeed and Another Vs. Jayram Arjun Tisge and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2000(1)BomCR74; 1999(1)MhLj17

Advocate for Respondent : A.H. Palekar, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard both the learned Counsel Shri Khadapkar for the petitioners and Shri Palekar for respondents Nos. 1 to 4. The two petitioners are original plaintiffs Nos. 4 and 8. Respondents are the original...

JabIn Akhtar Shirgonkar and ors. Vs. Samshad Iqbal Mukadam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 3(14), 3(17), 28(1), 30, 30A, 33, 35(5), 44, 43, 145, 146 and 176; Village Panchayat Rules - Rule 10 and 10(2); Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959; Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964 - Rules 10(2) and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR595; 2006(2)BomCR9; 2006(2)MhLj555

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok S. Kadam and ;Rakesh Bhatkar, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and ;A.H. Palekar, A.G.P for Respondent Nos. 8, 9 and 13

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Rule. Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 waive service. Learned A.G.P appears for respondent Nos. 8,9 & 13. Service on respondent Nos. 10 to 12 dispensed with. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The...

The Principal, Mahavir Mahavidyalaya and Vs. Mr. Deepak Ranganath Josh ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 5(49); Maharashtra Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation At, 1977 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 10(1) - Order 47

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR526

Advocate for Respondent : Respondent No. 1 in person, ;R.G. Ketkar, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 and ;A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 3

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. The First Respondent in person and Counsel for the other Respondents waive service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.2. The First Petitioner is a Principal of a College at...