Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Narendra Jaywant Dudang

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 57, 375, 376 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 28, 313 and 378(1); Bombay Children Act

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)140

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.G. Toraskar, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal preferred under section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. the State of Maharashtra impugns the Judgment and order dated 20/8/ 1985 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Greater Bombay in Sessions Case...

State of Maharashtra and Etc. Vs. Sahebrao @ Navnath Sopan Kale

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313, 354 and 361 to 366; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 201, 302, 354(3), 392, 449 and 460; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2788

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Toraskar, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present confirmation ease has been referred by the Additional sessions Judge, Pune, in pursuance to the provision of Section 366 of Cr. P. C., as appellant -accused No. 3 in criminal...

Keshav Baliram Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 345, 354, 376, 457, 506 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161and 313

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1111

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Nalavade, Addl. Public Prosecutor

1. Vide Judgement and Order dated 26-8-1993, passed in Sessions Case No. 135/1992, the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicted and sentenced the appellant in the manner stated hereinafter :-i) u/S. 457 I.P.C. to two years...

Nathubhai Babarbhai Patel Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 29, 36A, 36A(1) and 53; ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173 and 313; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25 and 26

Reported in : 2001CriLJ535

Advocate for Respondent : M.P. Galeria, Addl. P.P.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. These appeals are from a conviction for offences under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the NDPS Act'). Appellant No. 1, Mahendra Ramchandra Tendolkar has been convicted...

Manojkumar Pradeep Gupta and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) All these appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 02.03.2007 passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Addl. Sessions Jude, C.R. No.8, Sewree, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.344 of 2003...

Mani Kundaswami Shettiyar Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: (V.K. Tahilramani, J.) 1. The appellant-original accused has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 23rd February 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.295 of 2004....

Dilbahadur Mansing Khadaka and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Common Oral Judgment: (V.K. Tahilramani, J.) 1. Appellants i.e original accused No.1 - Dilbahadur Mansing Khadaka and original accused No.3 - Jaharsing Harising Badela have preferred Criminal Appeal No.1082 of 2009 against the Judgment and Order...

Dashrath Pandurang Khilare Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (Smt V.K. Tahilramani J.) 1. The Appellant – original Accused has preferred this Appeal against the judgment and order dated 16th May 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case...

The Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. the Director of E ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(3 and 4)

Reported in : 2000(1)BomCR466

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Toraskar, A.G.P., Adv.

ORDERShafi Parkar, J. 1. The appellants have taken exception to the penalty imposed by the two authorities below, imposing penalty of Rs. 2,500/- on the appellants for the alleged contravention of sub-sections (3) and (4) of...

Telco Ltd. Vs. Dir. of Enforcement of the Fera Board

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 8(3) and 8(4); Customs Act; Customs Regulations

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC253; 2000(115)ELT618(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.G. Toraskar, AGP

Shafi Parkar, J.1. The Appellants have taken exception to the penalty imposed by the two authorities below, imposing penalty of Rs. 2,500/- on the appellants for the alleged contravention of Sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section...