Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a g · Page 1 of about 262,140 results (1.388 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2008

Vikramsing S/O Jalamsing Walvi and Uttam S/O Nimbha Deshmukh Vs. the S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-31-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India (Seventy Third) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 2(3), 2(26A), 4, 5, 6, 12, 12(2), 42, 42(4), 56, 58, 58(1B), 67 and 67(5); Maharashttra Scheduled Areas Order, 1985; Constitution of India - Articles 40, 226, 243, 243B, 243D, 243D(1), 243D(4), 243K, 243K(1), 243M, 243M(4), 243O, 244, 244(1), 254(1), 329 and 368; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 - Rules 3, 4, 4(2), 7, 8, 8(2) and 14(2); Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti (Extension to the Scheduled Areas and Amendment) Ordinance, 1997; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Amendm

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR497; 2009(2)BomCR330

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1, ;S.T. Shelke, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;N.S. Chaudhary, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5, ;V.D. Hon, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and ;P.S. Patil, Adv.

N.V. Dabholkar, J.01. As described in petition paragraph 2 and prayer Clause (B), the Petitioners have approached this court for a relief of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

Vidarbha Heritage Society and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Legislature passed the Amending Act No. 39 of 1994; Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 31, 31(1), 31(2), 37 and 52; Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Amending Act No. 39 of 1995; Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Amending Act No. 39 of 1989 - Sections 158; Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1965 - Sections 156; Maharashtra Ancient Monuments & Archaeological Sites & Remains Act, 1960; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR577

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 5, ;C.S. Kaptan, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;S.K. Mishra, Adv. respondent No. 3, ;Sunil Manohar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 12 and 29 and ;Anand Parchure

Joshi A.H., J.1. Hearing of the Writ Petition No. 2340 of 2001 together with this petition has been expedited by the Hon'ble Apex Court, as certain interlocutory orders passed by this Court were questioned before the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1998

Mayakrishnan R. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-16-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ304Ker

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General by Alex Mathew, G.P. and;O.V. Radhakrishnan SC

A.C. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Two common questions arise for determination in these cases, viz. (1) whether the amendment brought to the General Rules (Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules) as per notification G.O.(P) N0.57/1992/P&ARD; dated December...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2005

G. Shravan Kumar Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Princi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1962 - Rules 23, 25, 26, 33, 34, 36 and 36(1); Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services (Amendment) Rules, 1996 - Rules 33 and 34 and 36; ;Ad hoc Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD732; 2005(3)ALT470

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. for Services I for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Prakash Reddy and ;M. Venkat Ram Reddy, Advs. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. One Koteswara Raju and the present writ petitioner had set the law in motion by filing O.A.No. 3908/98 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, in short referred to as 'Tribunal' hereinafter,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2007

K. Ravinchandra Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. Revenue (Endowme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-20-2007

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 15, 15(1), 16, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(3), 20, 28, 28(1), 149 and 153; Schedule Castes and The Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Land Acquisition Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 182, 294, 323, 366, 392, 420, 436 and 506; Immigration Act, 1917 - Sections 19; Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 11 and 294; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2008(1)ALT537

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. for Endowments for R-4, ;V.T.M. Prasad, Adv. for R-6 and ;Subba Reddy, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. K.Ravichandra Reddy and 16 others filed the present Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent in G.O.Rt. No. 1515, dt. 16-7-2007 as illegal, null, void and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2000

Gogula Lingamma Vs. Government of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-23-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 321; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 148, 149 and 302

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD5; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)140; 2000(5)ALT613; 2001CriLJ198

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. E. Madan Mohan,;G.P. for Home and;Mr. Bonala Krishna Rao, Adv.

1. This writ petition was filed by the unfortunate mother, aged about 60 years, of the deceased G. Vijay, who was alleged to have been murdered by the second respondent Jalagam Sudershan Rao and his associates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2001

Ram Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-25-2001

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules 1952 - Rules 6, 115A, 115A(3), 115B, 115S, 115S(1), 155L to 155R and 173 to 177; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 31B, 38(2), 39, 46 and 243G; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 28B; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 3(14), 3(18), 117, 122A(2), 122C(4), 122C(6), 122C(7), 126, 333 and 333A; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 117; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC3149; (2001)3UPLBEC2530

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Verma and ;Sankatha Rai, Advs.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. Heard.2. The aforesaid writ petitions are posted today for admission. The learned standing counsel, Sri L.P. Tewari is raising preliminary objections of general importance in these writ petitions inviting my attention to conflicting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2006

Pramod Bhagwan Nayak Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(4), 6, 7, 7(1), 8, 9, 9(2), 13, 15, 15(2), 18, 19 and 20; Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Arms Act; Consumer's Protection Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 366A, 366B, 372 and 373; Prevention of Immoral Traffic (Amendment) Act, 1978; Prevention of Immoral Traffic (Amendment) Act, 1986; Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 6, 21, 22(5), 22(6), 23, 39, 46, 51A, 142 and 145(5)

Reported in : (2007)1GLR796

Advocate for Respondent : L.R. Pujari, A.G.P. and; Banna Datta, Amicus Curiae

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Pramod Bhagwan Nayak, petitioner original detenu, has filed this habeas corpus petition challenging the order dated 23-8-2005 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat City, Surat, respondent No. 2 herein. The petition was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1956

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Financ ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-1956

Subject : Excise

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1957Mad110

Advocate for Respondent : K. Vittal Rao and ;G.K. Govinda Bhat, Advs.

Govinda Menon, J.1. In this seconcTappeal the appellant is the Unionof India, represented by the Secretary, Ministryof Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, andthe questions that arise are firstly whether a civilCourt has got jurisdiction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1997

A. Deivendran Vs. State of T.N.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-21-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 10(3), 306, 306(1), 306(4), 307, 337, 460, 465 and 529; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 338; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 411

Reported in : AIR1998SC2821; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)884; 1998CriLJ814; JT1997(8)SC619; 1997(6)SCALE516; (1997)11SCC720; [1997]Supp4SCR591

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, ; Sr. Adv. and ; V.G. Pragasam, Adv.

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.2. Criminal appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 487 of 1996 is by the convict A. Devendran who has been sentenced to death...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial