Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a dash · Page 1 of about 9,355 results (0.243 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 05 1998

Gour Chandra Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-05-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Orissa Zilla Parishad Act, 1991 - Sections 33, 33(2) and 36(2); Orissa Zilla Parishad Election Rules, 1994 - Rule 48(1); Orissa Zilla Parishad (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1996 - Rule 26

Reported in : AIR1998Ori198; 1998(II)OLR179

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Dash, Standing Counsel, ;Patitapaban Panda, ;S. Patnaik, ;A.K. Nayak, ;C. Samantray, ;H.S. Satpathy, ;A. Mohanta, ;S.D. Das, ;Jagannath Patnaik, ;G.S. Das, ;Manoj Mishra, ;P.K. Das, ;B. Mishra, ;

R.K. Patra, J.1. The petitioner who is one of the elected members of the Ganjam Zilla Parishad has filed this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for declaration that opposite parties 5...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2004

Michael B. Fernandes Vs. C.K. Jaffer Sharief and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-05-2004

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 61A; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004Kant289

Advocate for Respondent : Venkateshwar N.K. and ;H.D. Amarnathan and ;Madhumitabagchi, Advs. for No. 1 and ;Sonnegowda, Adv. for No. 2

ORDERK. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. This Election Petition does not only challenge the integrity of the election of the first respondent but also the efficacy and integrity of the electronic voting machine used in the election of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2009

Mukesh Nayak Vs. Brijendra Pratap Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-24-2009

Subject : CivilElection

Reported in : 2010(1)MPHT396

ORDERR.C. Mishra, J.1. This order shall govern disposal of I.A. No. 43/2009, which is an application, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for brevity 'the Code') read with Section 86 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 21 2004

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dinabandhu Nayak and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-21-2004

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166

Reported in : I(2005)ACC539; 2006ACJ585; 2004(I)OLR292

Advocate for Respondent : Sujata Dash, ;P.K. Mishra and ;Babita Sahu, Advs. For Respondent No. 1

A.S. Naidu, J. 1. These Letters Pattent Appeals are filed by M/s.Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. being aggrieved by a common judgment dated 3.5.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in M.A. Nos. 200...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2002

Dibakar Naik and ors. Vs. Hara Naik and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-25-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 100

Reported in : 2002(II)OLR319

Advocate for Respondent : Susanta Kumar Dash, S.K. Mishra, B. Mohapatra and Surya Kanta Dash

L. Mohapatra, J.1. Defendants are the appellants before this Court against a confirming judgment.2. Plaintiffs-respondents had filed a suit for partition of properties mentioned in Schedule-B of the plaint claiming half share therein.Case of the plaintiffs-respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2006

B.C. Ramachandra S/O Chikkashetty Vs. State of Karnataka by Channaraya ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304A and 337; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313;

Reported in : 2007CriLJ475

Advocate for Respondent : Satish R. Girji, HOGP

ORDERB.S. Patil, J1. The revision petitioner is convicted for the offences punishable Under Section 279, 337 and 304-A IPC. He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for different periods and to pay fine for the aforesaid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2006

Mahadev Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 80, 279, 304A and 338

Reported in : III(2006)ACC370; 2007ACJ1778; 2006CriLJ4246; 2006(2)MPHT146

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Chouhan, Govt. Adv.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. This criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment passed by Sessions Judge, West Nimar, Mandleshwar, in Cr. Appeal No. 214/1999 on dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2003

Mohd. Anis and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168; Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : 2005ACJ1935; AIR2003MP276

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Ruprah, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdol, Claim Case No. 27/92, dated 29-3-1996.2. Briefly, claimants are legal heirs, of driver Mohd. Safi (deceased). They are claiming...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1996

Dr. Doma Alias Devendra Kumar Vs. Sheikh Hasan Alias Shabboo Master an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicle

Reported in : 1997ACJ893

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Ruprah and ; Ruprah, Adv.

S.K. Dubey, J.1. M.A. No. 159 of 1990 has been filed by the injured claimant whose application for compensation filed in Claim Case No. 16 of 1988 has been dismissed by award dated 15.3.1989 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1988

Basanta Kumar Mohanty Vs. Utkal University and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-13-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1990Ori10; 67(1989)CLT199

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Mohanty, ;Devasia Panda and ;A.K. Mohapatra, Advs.

G.B. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of a mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 1-University to issue the B.A. diploma and for a direction to opposite party No. 3 to reinstate the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial