Advanced Search Results

Pic Departmental Private Limited Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

W.P.No.1726 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side PIC Departmental Private Limited versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.For the Petitioner : Mr.Sakti Nath Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.S.Basu, Sr.Advocate Ms.S.Mukherjee, Advocate...

Mahendra Kumar Sutar, Prop. of M/S. R.C. Metal Industries Vs. Union of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET WP NO.415 OF2014IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MAHENDRA KUMAR SUTAR, PROP. OF M/S.R.C.METAL INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ……… BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 27th...

Kalicharan Book Sellers Vs. Manmath Choudhury and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Bhattacharjee, B.C. Das, S.A. Chowdhury, A.K. Chowdhury and K. Baruah, Advs.

A. K. Patnaik, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and award dated 6.1.1986 of the Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kamrup, Gauhati, in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 1(K) of 1979.2. The brief facts...

Suben Maradi and anr. Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

P.K. Musahary, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Morigaon in Sessions Case No. 11/2001 convicting the accused-appellants under Section 302/201, IPC and sentencing them...

Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

B.P. Katakey, J.1. By this batch of writ petitions the petitioners are in basically claiming salaries, to which according to them they are entitled to, for the period, they have rendered their service pursuant to the...

Kaushik Kantilal Trivedi and anr. Vs. Secretary, Gujarat Public Servic ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 217(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 10(4); Advocates Act, 1961

Reported in : (2002)3GLR83

Advocate for Respondent : N.J. Shah, Adv. for; D.N. Patel, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. Both the matters are taken up for final hearing today and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Whether an Advocate practising in the District Court or even in the Labour or...

Lakshmi Ammal and ors. Vs. Chakravahthi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act

Reported in : AIR1999SC3363; 1999(1)CTC256; (1999)1SCC235

ORDER1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 27th April, 1987 passed by the Madras High Court in A.S. No. 324 of 1981 and Tr. A.S. No. 789/82. The plain-tiff-respondent-Chakravahthi filed O.S. No. 71 1977,...

Associated Engineering Co. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anothe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act

Reported in : AIR1992SC232; 1991(2)ARBLR182(SC); 2(1991)BC375(SC); (1991)3CompLJ86(SC); JT1991(3)SC123; 1991(2)SCALE50; (1991)4SCC93; [1991]2SCR924; 1991(2)LC347(SC); MANU/SC/0054/1992

Advocate for Respondent : K. Madhava Reddy, ; G. Prabhakar and ; T.V.S.N. Chari (N.P.)

ORDERT. Kochu Thommen, J. 1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 7071-72 of 1986.2. These appeals are brought against the common judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in O.M.A. No. 456 of 1984 and C.R.P....

Delhi Development Authority Vs. U. Kashyap

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCommercial

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)300; 1998(1)ARBLR88(Delhi); 1999(48)DRJ666

Advocate for Respondent : Sh. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and ; Sh. Raman Kapur, Adv.

K.S. Gupta, J.1. This appeal by Delhi Development Authority is directed against the judgment dated April 29, 1994 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the objections filed by it to claim no.11 and making the award...

B. Nana Rao Vs. M.U. Arunachalam Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1940Mad385; (1940)1MLJ482

Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. The question which has been referred for decision is this:In a private transfer made after and during the pendency of an attachment in one suit, void against the title of an...