Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a choudhary · Page 1 of about 9,790 results (0.427 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 2000

Durga Mazdoor Co-op. Society Ltd., Bhandara and ors. Vs. Divisional Jo ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73G,(2B), 73H (1 and 2) and 77A(1 and 4)

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR832; 2001(2)BomCR485; (2001)1BOMLR327; 2000(4)MhLj786

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Gavai, Government Pleader, ;A.B. Choudhari, ;M.V. Samarth, ;D.A. Mahajan and ;P.B. Patil, Advs.

D. D. Sinha, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. Shri S. P. Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, contended that the petitioners are the primary members and shareholders...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1972

State of Maharashtra Vs. Govind Purushottam Shahane

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-25-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1974CriLJ18; 1973MhLJ314

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Choudhari

ORDERTulzapurkar, J.1. This revision application has been preferred by the State of Maharashtra against the order passed by the learned Special Judge, Nasik in Special Case No. 2 of 1971 on 12th June, 1971 whereby the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1974

Subhash Ganpatrao Buty and anr. Vs. Maroti and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-27-1974

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1975Bom244; (1975)77BOMLR517; 1975MhLJ244

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Choudhary

Tulzapurkar, J. 1. Two questions have been referred to this Full Bench by e learned Single Judge for our determination which run as follows:- (1) What is the true and correct interpretation of the Explanation appended...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 23 2004

Manjulabai Wd/O Shalikram Gohate and ors. Vs. Bhagirathibai Wd/O Ganes ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100; ; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 58

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj50

Advocate for Respondent : A.B. Choudhary, Adv.

S.T. Kharche, J. 1. By invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22nd December, 1989 passed by the learned Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2006

Brij Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 96 to 106, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323, 324, 427, 447; Indian Arms Act - Sections 3, 25 and 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 146, 173(8), 299, 313; SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3182

Advocate for Respondent : J.P.S. Choudhary, Public Prosecutor and; Ravindra Acharya, Adv. in D.B. Cr. Appeal No. 185/2005 and i

N.N. Mathur, J.1. These two appeals arises out of the same occurrence alleged to have taken place in the were hours of 12.11.99 in the field known as Jod Wala Khet on the outskirt of Village...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2004

Deen Dayal Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-19-2004

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh PAC Act - Sections 8; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 497

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC1814

Advocate for Respondent : Shatrughan Choudhary, S.C.

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard Shri Amit Bose learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Shatrughan Choudhary learned Standing Counsel. Question of law involved in the present writ petition is as to whether under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Vyapari Sangh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 298

Reported in : AIR2005MP99; 2005(2)CTLJ72(MP); 2005(2)MPLJ105

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. (for No. 1), ;V.S. Choudhary, Adv. (for No. 2), ;S.D. Mishra, Adv. (for No. 3) and ;Sharad Verma, Adv. (for No. 4)

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The centroidal issue and the Kernel of controversy that arises for adjudication in this case compels one to put a singular and pointed question: Whether a local body can abandon its sense of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Shamsher Gujjar @ Choudhary Vs. Sartaj Hotel Apartments and Villas Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sunil Atreya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 163/2013 with I.A. Nos. 11925/2013, 7867/2014, and 14174/2014 SHAMSHER GUJJAR @ CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Gandhi, Mr. Ravi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1993

Ram Ekwal Thakur Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-30-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Aquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 16(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2

Advocate for Respondent : Raghib Ahsan, S.C., Khurshid Ahmad Siddiqui, S.K. Mazumdar and Ramesh Kumar Choudhary, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. This application is directed against the orders dated 27-7-1989 passed by the respondent No. 4; the order dated 2-1-1991 passed by the respondentNo. 3 and the resolution dated 18-2-1992 passedby the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 1995

Mona Aggarwal Subhashkumar Aggarwal Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Me ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-30-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rules for Admission to Post Graduate Courses in Medicine, 1993 - Rule 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 58 and 115

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR64; (1995)97BOMLR655

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Manohar, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;A.P. Shinde, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and ;A.B. Choudhary, Adv. for respondent No. 3

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard learned Counsel.The petitioner herein challenges the selection of respondent No. 3 for the graduate diploma course in Gynaecology and Obstetrics and claims the said registration for herself.For understanding the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial