Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a c roy · Page 1 of about 925 results (0.154 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 22 2000

State of Tripura Vs. Ashoke Kumar Subba

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-22-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 420, 468 and 469

Advocate for Respondent : K.H. Choudhury Sr. Adv., A.C. Bhowmik and D.C. Roy, Advs.

M.L. Singhal, J.1. The accused-Ashoke Kumar Subba one of the managing partners of M/s. Bindhya Agency, entered into an agreement on 8-1-1993 with the State of Tripura for conductingTripura State Lottery as an agent. In terms...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2000

Prabhat Chandra Roy (Deceased) Substituted by Patroleka Roy and ors. V ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-27-2000

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 23

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Roy and Jaya Roy, Advs.

A.K. Prasad, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court in F.A. No. 134 of 1984 (R), while reversing the judgment and decree of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2002

Thai Airways International Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-24-2002

Subject : CustomsConstitution

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 115(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(160)ELT75(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roy Chowdhury and ;A. Deb, Advs.

ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. The Court : The writ petitioners are a foreign Airways Company and its General Manager. They are affected by an order passed by the Collector of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, dated 19th April,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 18 2003

Tapan Kumar Bhattacharjee Vs. Ratan Kr. Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-18-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 97

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Roy and S. Bhattacharjee, Advs.

T. Vaiphei,J.1. Heard Mr. A. Lodh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. D.C. Roy, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The short question of law to be determined in this case is whether this appeal lies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1988

M. Satyanarayana Vs. Orissa State Warehousing Corporation and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-01-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ653Ori

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohanty, ;A.C. Mohanty, ;S.C Roy and ;S.S. Basu, Advs.

K.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged Annexure-4 dated 8.6.1981 by which he was intimated that opposite party No. 3 had been allowed joint seniority with him as well as Annexure-5 dated 4.6.1981 by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2006

Bijita Saha and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-06-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 300A

Advocate for Respondent : T.C. Roy and A. Ghosh, Advs.

A.B. Pal, J.1. In this writ petition, the only question this Court is called upon to decide Is whether in the undisputed facts and circumstances of this case, a writ Court can direct the State Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2006

Suresh Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Arti Choubey and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 2(1), 11(1), 14, 14(8) and 15; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 116

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR47(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Roy, Adv.

ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this revision application, preferred under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the tenants-defendants-petitioners have assailed the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1981

Bayer Aktiengesellschaft of Leverkusen Federal Republic of Germany Vs. ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-29-1981

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsLimitation

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1)(I) and 71; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : AIR1982Cal30

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roy Chowdhury, Adv.

ORDERPratibha Bonnerjea, J.1. This is an application Under Section 71 of the Patents Act 1970 for rectification of the entry relating to Patent No. 139978 in the register of the respondent. This application is contested by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1978

Aluminium Company of America Vs. Joint Controller of Patents and Desig ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-23-1978

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Section 5 and 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1979Cal210

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roy Choudhury and ;D. Som, Advs.

Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 116 of the Patents Act from an order refusing an application for patent under Section 15(2) of the Patents Act. The facts of the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 1986

Gonterman Peipers (India) Limited Vs. Additional Secretary to the Gove ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-05-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11B, 35, 35A, 36 and 36(2); ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 128, 130, 131(3) and 131(5); ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; ;Additional Duties of Excise (Amendment) Act, 1980; ;Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Section 15; ;Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act; ;Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; ;Central Excise Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC33,1991LC286(Calcutta),1986(26)ELT471(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roy Chowdhury and ;Amjad Ali, Advs.

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged a show cause notice dated 10th September, 1981 issued by the Additional Secretary, Government of India under Section 36(2)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial