Advanced Search Results
State of Tripura Vs. Ashoke Kumar Subba
Guwahati
May-22-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 420, 468 and 469
K.H. Choudhury Sr. Adv., A.C. Bhowmik and D.C. Roy, Advs.
M.L. Singhal, J.1. The accused-Ashoke Kumar Subba one of the managing partners of M/s. Bindhya Agency, entered into an agreement on 8-1-1993 with the State of Tripura for conductingTripura State Lottery as an agent. In terms...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhat Chandra Roy (Deceased) Substituted by Patroleka Roy and ors. V ...
Patna
Sep-27-2000
FamilyProperty
Hindu Law; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 23
P.C. Roy and Jaya Roy, Advs.
A.K. Prasad, J. 1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court in F.A. No. 134 of 1984 (R), while reversing the judgment and decree of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThai Airways International Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Kolkata
Sep-24-2002
CustomsConstitution
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 115(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226
2003(160)ELT75(Cal)
N.C. Roy Chowdhury and ;A. Deb, Advs.
ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. The Court : The writ petitioners are a foreign Airways Company and its General Manager. They are affected by an order passed by the Collector of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, dated 19th April,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tapan Kumar Bhattacharjee Vs. Ratan Kr. Bhattacharjee and ors.
Guwahati
Sep-18-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 97
D.C. Roy and S. Bhattacharjee, Advs.
T. Vaiphei,J.1. Heard Mr. A. Lodh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. D.C. Roy, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The short question of law to be determined in this case is whether this appeal lies...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Satyanarayana Vs. Orissa State Warehousing Corporation and ors.
Orissa
Jul-01-1988
Labour and Industrial
(1994)IIILLJ653Ori
R. Mohanty, ;A.C. Mohanty, ;S.C Roy and ;S.S. Basu, Advs.
K.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged Annexure-4 dated 8.6.1981 by which he was intimated that opposite party No. 3 had been allowed joint seniority with him as well as Annexure-5 dated 4.6.1981 by which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijita Saha and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.
Guwahati
Jan-06-2006
Civil
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 300A
T.C. Roy and A. Ghosh, Advs.
A.B. Pal, J.1. In this writ petition, the only question this Court is called upon to decide Is whether in the undisputed facts and circumstances of this case, a writ Court can direct the State Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Arti Choubey and anr.
Jharkhand
Apr-21-2006
Tenancy
Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 2(1), 11(1), 14, 14(8) and 15; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 116
[2006(3)JCR47(Jhr)]
P.C. Roy, Adv.
ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this revision application, preferred under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the tenants-defendants-petitioners have assailed the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBayer Aktiengesellschaft of Leverkusen Federal Republic of Germany Vs. ...
Kolkata
Jul-29-1981
Intellectual Property RightsLimitation
Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1)(I) and 71; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137
AIR1982Cal30
N.C. Roy Chowdhury, Adv.
ORDERPratibha Bonnerjea, J.1. This is an application Under Section 71 of the Patents Act 1970 for rectification of the entry relating to Patent No. 139978 in the register of the respondent. This application is contested by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAluminium Company of America Vs. Joint Controller of Patents and Desig ...
Kolkata
Aug-23-1978
Intellectual Property Rights
Patents Act, 1970 - Section 5 and 5(2)
AIR1979Cal210
N.C. Roy Choudhury and ;D. Som, Advs.
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 116 of the Patents Act from an order refusing an application for patent under Section 15(2) of the Patents Act. The facts of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGonterman Peipers (India) Limited Vs. Additional Secretary to the Gove ...
Kolkata
May-05-1986
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11B, 35, 35A, 36 and 36(2); ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 128, 130, 131(3) and 131(5); ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; ;Additional Duties of Excise (Amendment) Act, 1980; ;Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Section 15; ;Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act; ;Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; ;Central Excise Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11
1987(13)ECC33,1991LC286(Calcutta),1986(26)ELT471(Cal)
N.C. Roy Chowdhury and ;Amjad Ali, Advs.
Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged a show cause notice dated 10th September, 1981 issued by the Additional Secretary, Government of India under Section 36(2)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »