Advanced Search Results
Hardas Singh and Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and anr
Delhi
May-09-2011
Constitution
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Section 9; Constitution of India - Article 226
Ms Saroj Bidawat, Adv.
1. By way of present petition, petitioners have challenged a finding on a preliminary issue by the Estate Officer, a statutory authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Saurashtra Color Tones Pvt. Ltd and anr.
Delhi
Jul-02-2009
ElectricityCommercial
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1988 - Sections 17, 29(1) and 29(4); Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 21(2), 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 49A, 50 and 51; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act 2000 - Sections 11, 19, 20, 28, 28(2), 61 and 63(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27; Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules 2001 - Rule 10(2); Electricity Supply Code
AIR2010Delhi14; 161(2009)DLT28
S.C. Nigam and ; A. Nayak, Advs.
Ajit Prakash Shah, C.J.RELEVANT FACTS1. The appellant is a distribution company engaged in distribution of electricity in its area of supply under a statutory licence issued by the respondent No. 2, Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Pamela Manmohan Singh Vs. Uttam Chand Trust and ors.
Delhi
May-17-2002
PropertyLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 12 - Order 23, Rules 1 and 2; Limitation Act - Sections 14
98(2002)DLT392
S.C. Nigam and ; Neelam Tiwari, Advs.
J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The conspectus of facts as culled out from the pleadings need to be recapitulated for deciding the following preliminary issues arising out of the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.1. Whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shiv Murti Sharma and Another Vs. Vith Additional District Judge, Kanp ...
Allahabad
Feb-10-1999
Tenancy
Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)
1999(2)AWC997
A.C. Nigam, Adv.
Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writpetition is directed against the orderof the appellate authority dated1.12.1998 allowing the appeal andreleasing the disputedaccommodation in favour of thelandlord-respondent No. 3 underSection 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumer Singh Vs. Sidhartha
Delhi
Feb-29-2000
Motor Vehicles
II(2000)ACC8; 2001ACJ2044; 2000VAD(Delhi)1; 85(2000)DLT544; 2000(54)DRJ255
Mr. S.C. Nigam, Adv.
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The above six appeals have arisen out of the judgment rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, hereinafter called the Tribunal, awarding compensation to the claimants, in the petitions for compensation filed on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-10-1990
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
I(1991)DMC91; [1991(63)FLR227]
S.I. Jafri, J.1. The instant revision has been filed by .applicant Devendra Singh impugaing thereby the judgment and order dated 1-12-1989 passed by Sri K.C. Agarwal, Sessions Judge Deoria awarding maintenance allowance of Rs. 400/- per...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. P.N. Khanna and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-01-2002
Labour and IndustrialConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A
2003(1)AWC551; [2003(96)FLR541]
Party in person, ;H.N. Singh and ;P.N. Sinha, Advs. and ;S.C.
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.2. The petitioner U.P. State Electricity Board (now Corporation) has challenged the award dated 9.2.1989 passed by the Industrial Tribunal II. U.P., Lucknow,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mangilal JaIn and S.C. Nigam
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-01-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)
[1997]223ITR98(MP)
S.C. Goyal and ;V.K. Jain, Advs.
A.R. Tiwari, J. 1. The applicant (Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal) has filed these applications under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), seeking a direction to the Tribunal to state the cases...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKundanlal JaIn Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Delhi
Feb-21-1984
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rules 2, 3, 4(2) and 4(3) - Order 41, Rule 21
1984RLR255
M.L. Jain, J. (1) The appellant filed a suit for injunction against the respondent Mcd restraining them from dispossessing him from certain disputed premises. The suit was decreed by the learned Sub-Judge on 7.11.81. The Corporation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBal Kishan Giri Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
May-28-2014
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.555 OF2010Bal Kishan Giri …Appellant Versus State of U.P. …Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. Chauhan,J.1. In this appeal, impugned judgment and order dated 5.2.2010 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »