Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a c c associates · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.538 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1997

Kaveriappa and Another Vs. Kariyappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-18-1997

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1999ACJ528; 1998(4)KarLJ372

Advocate for Respondent : Sri H.G. Ramesh, ;M/s. A.C.C. Associates, Advs.

1. The appeal is directed against the joint order dated 4th July, 1991, wherein compensation of Rs. 5,400/- was awarded to the father in relation to the injuries suffered by him and compensation of Rs. 23,400/-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1999

M/S. Prakash Roadlines Limited, Bangalore and Another Vs. Smt. Prema

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-03-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 115; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 19(2), 27 and 30; Civil Courts Act

Reported in : 2000ACJ481; [1999(82)FLR751]; ILR1999KAR2808; 1999(4)KarLJ317; (1999)IILLJ1313Kant

Advocate for Respondent : M/s. A.C.C. Associates, Adv.

ORDER1. These revision applications under Section 115 of the CPC have been filed challenging the order dated 26-10-1998 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Sub-Division II, Bangalore.2. Workmen's Compensation Act confers a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1995

Tulasamma Vs. Srinivasan

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-08-1995

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 133

Reported in : ILR1995KAR1328; 1995(2)KarLJ300

Advocate for Respondent : A.C.C. Associates

Saldanha, J1. Heard appellant's learned Advocate and respondent's learned Advocate.2. The principal ground on which the order passed by the trial Court has been challenged by the appellant's learned Advocate is that according to him, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 14 1992

Agarwal Traders Represented by Gulshan Kumar Agarwal and anr. Vs. Magn ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 and 115

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT435

Advocate for Respondent : S. Vani, Adv.

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad has jurisdiction to entertaint the suit - O.S. No. 2163 of 1987 - filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1974

R.D. Aggarwala and anr. Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-06-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Industrial (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18G; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(29); Cement Control Order, 1967

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi520

T.V.R. Tatachari, J. (1) These three letters Patent Appeals. Nos. 17, 45, and 18 of 1970, can be disposed of by a common judgment. The appellants in letters Patent Appeal No. 17 of 1970 are (1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1992

The Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-03-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37

Reported in : (1992)103CTR(Del)82; 47(1992)DLT623; [1992]195ITR290(Delhi)

D.K. Jain, J.(1) In these two references (wrongly numbered as three references) under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), at the instance of the Revenue, for the assessment years 1967-68 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2009

Sahakar Agencies Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-17-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR757; 2009(111)BomLR1547

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Rohatgi, ;F.E. D'Vitre, ;V.R. Dhond and ;Deepak Chitnis, Advs., i/b., D.C.C. & Associates for Respondent No. 2 in Writ Petition (L) No. 2584 of 2008, ;R.M. Kadam, Adv.-General, ;P.P. Chavan,

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.Factual matrix of the cases1. The Petitioners in Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 2584 of 2008, namely, M/s Sahakar Agencies Pvt. Ltd., a Company duly registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, claim...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial