Advanced Search Results

H.B. Financial Consultants (P) Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)89TTJ(Del)1042

ORDERKeshaw Prasad, A.M.The appeal has been directed by the assessed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 4-2-2000 pertaining to assessment year 1996-97. 2. Ground of appeal Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 9 are...

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 28, 47, 81, 111, 111(2), 165, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 184, 210, 284, 284(3), 284(4), 301, 391, 392, 393, 394, 433 and 637; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 35A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 19(5), 21, 21(2), 21(3), 28, 28(1), 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(4), 30, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 50, 56, 57, 61(2), 73, 73(3) and 75

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)

Madhava Reddy, C.J.1. The questions that arise for consideration in this writ petition filed by Escorts Ltd. and its shareholder and managing director are quite unique and important. The decision thereon may affect not only the...

Harish Peswani vs.jaishree Peswani & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~17. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.498/2016 & IA No.12006/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC). HARISH PESWANI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr....

Ramesh Chand Vs. L.D. Malik and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : [1986(52)FLR629]; (1994)IIILLJ51Del

Yogeshwar Dayal, J. 1. The petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of the learned Labour Court dated 8th March, 1985 whereby the learned Labour Court inter alias declined...

Manmohan Singh Vs. Kushwant Kaur

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.P. Sengh, Mr. A.C. Bhasin, Mr. Sumeet Batra

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. (M) No.268 of 2012 & C.M. No.4077/2012 (for stay) Decided on :30. h April, 2013 MANMOHAN SINGH Through: . Petitioner Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate. Versus KUSHWANT...

Lakshmi Devi and ors. Vs. Mamleshwar Pershad and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14

Reported in : 27(1985)DLT26

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Ishwar Sahai

Aggarwal, J. (1) Shri Mamleshwar Prasad, the respondent herein, filed a petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act seeking eviction of the tenant Jagat Narain from premises described as 3173, Phatak NanakChand, Mohalla Dassan, Delhi, inter-alia,...

Prem Chand Sharma Vs. Ram Gopal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.P. Singh, Mr. Amit Bhasin

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 363/2014 Reserved on:18. h March, 2015 Decided on:7. h April, 2015 % PREM CHAND SHARMA (NOW DECEASED) & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish...

Ashok Kumar Ahuja and anr Vs. Gulab Rai Khanchandani

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 08.02.2012. + CM(M) 1438/2011 and CM No. 22420/2011 ASHOK KUMAR AHUJA and ANR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with...

Texmaco Ltd. Vs. Arun Kumar Sharma and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630

Reported in : [1991]70CompCas287(Delhi); 42(1990)DLT115

Advocate for Respondent : A.C. Bhasin, Adv.

Bahri, J.1. In all these criminal revision petitions, the same type of orders have been made by the learned A. C. M. M. and in revision by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and thus they are...

M/S Texmaco Limiteds Vs. Shri Roshan Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 39, 41, 43, 226; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 7(7) and 13; Minimum Wages Act; Payment of Bonus Act; Provident Funds Act; Employees State Insurance Act; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 3(1)

Reported in : [2001(91)FLR138]; (2001)IILLJ982Del

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.C. Bhasin, ; Mr. J.N. Verma, ; Ms Geeta Luthra, A

ORDER1. A large number of Letters Patent Appeals have been filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 22.2.1992 by which a large number of writ petitions were disposed of. The questions of law...