Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a arumugam · Page 1 of about 2,034 results (0.183 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 1997

Dr. Jagannath Mishra and ors. Vs. C.B.i. and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-10-1997

Subject : Criminal

D.S. Dhaliwal, J.1. This order will also dispose of Cr. Misc. No. 11995/97 and Cr. Misc. No. 13123/97 as all the three applications for bail arise out of one and the same case, R.C. Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2006

Puran Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16(1)

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR277]; [2006(4)JCR21(SC)]; JT2006(2)SC565; 2006(2)SCALE465; (2006)3SCC97; 2006(2)SLJ405(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv., ; Rekha Pandey and ; Sushma Suri,

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These appeals are interlinked and are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. Appellant challenges the judgments of a Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court at Shimla holding that the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2008

Madan Lal (Since Deceased) and ors. Vs. Prabhu Dayal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-28-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009Raj57; RLW2009(2)Raj1760

ORDERDalip Singh, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff against the order passed by the learned trial Court dated 17-5-2007 by which the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 2008

K.A. Duraisamy and P.D. Chockalingam Vs. the Government of Tamilnadu R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-15-2008

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act, 1984 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21, 22 and 33; Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Rules, 1984; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 113; Bombay City Police Act; Bombay City Police Rules - Rule 7; Tamil Nadu Exhibition of Films on Television Screen through Video Cassette Recorders and Cable Television Network (Regulation) Ordinance, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : (2009)1MLJ755

Advocate for Respondent : A. Arumugam, Special Govt. Pleader

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard Mr. K. Doraisami, learned Senior Counsel leading Mr. Kandan Doraisami and Mr.A.Arumugam, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents and perused the records.2. Both the writ petitioners challenges the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2010

Tata Tea Limited, Velonie Estate Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represent ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 2(3), 3, 4, 25A, 25A(1), 25A(2), 25K, 25K(2) and 25L(3); ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 1(3), 2, 9, 20, 25A(1), 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F, 25FFF, 25T, 25U and 30; ;Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act - 1953; ;Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to workmen) Act, 1981 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5(1), 5(3), 9, 18(1), 32 and 36; ;Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Payment of Gratuity Act - Section 2 and 2A; ;Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Fund Act; ;Tamil Nadu Plantations Labour Rules, 1985 - Rules 6(4) and 69; ;Constitution of India - Articles 42 and 226

Advocate for Respondent : A. Arumugam, Adv. in Spl. G.P.(W) for R1,; G.B. Saravana Bhavan, Adv. for RR6, 7, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18,

ORDERK. Chandru, J.I. History of indentured Labour:1.1. Tea gardens like other industrial establishments must depend on offering sufficient attractions in order to maintain their labour force. The emigrant must be convinced that Assam holds out the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2010

N. Rajamani Vs. the Secretary to Government Highways (Hl) Department a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 17; ;Andhra Pradesh Civil Service (CCA) Rules, 1963 - Rule 9

Advocate for Respondent : A. Arumugam, Spl. G.P.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Mr. A. Arumugam, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice.2. The petitioner in both the writ petitions is one and the same person. He was formerly working as a Junior Engineer in Thirunavallur Panchayat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1998

Selvaraj P. Vs. M.D., Kattabomman Transport Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-01-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Specific Relief Act - Sections 34

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ1186Mad

Advocate for Respondent : A. Arumugam, Adv.

K.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned II Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in Appeal Suit No. 44 of 1982 confirming that of the learned II Assistant Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2026

B.Velankanni vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Its

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.5186 of 2026 B. Velankanni … Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2016

Satya Pal Gupta and Others Vs. Sudhir Kumar Gupta and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. The appellant in RFA(OS) 76/2013 [hereafter referred to as "Satyapal"] is aggrieved by a decree for possession. He is also aggrieved by the dismissal of his suit [CS(OS) 1399/2011] by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1912

Muthukumaraswami Pillai and Seven ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-1912

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)ILR35Mad397

Benson, J.1. In this case fourteen persons were tried by a Special Bench of this Court, constituted under Section 6(b) of the Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, for an offence punishable under Section 121A, Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial