Advanced Search Results

Syed Nizam Ahmed Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1698/2011 and Crl.M.B.No.2109/2011 % Judgment reserved on : 24th January, 2012 Judgment delivered on: 06th February, 2012 SYED NIZAM AHMED ..... Petitioner Through...

Keshub Mahindra Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227, 228, 397 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 299, 304, 304A, 321, 322, 324, 326, 336, 337, 338, 425 and 429; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : II(1996)ACC292; 1996VIAD(SC)657; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)662; 1996(3)Crimes288(SC); JT1996(8)SC136; 1996(6)SCALE522; (1996)6SCC129; [1996]Supp6SCR285

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General, ; P. Parameswaran and ;

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in all these Special Leave Petitions.2. In these appeals the concerned appellant - accused have brought in challenge the order dated 8th April 1993 passed by the Court of 9th Additional...

Tummu Rajapu Reddy Vs. P. Koteswaramma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39 Rule 1

Reported in : 2005(4)ALT446

Advocate for Respondent : Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The first defendant in O.S. No. 23 of 2004 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur, Medak District is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. Respondents 1 to 4 herein...

Syed Ali Murtuza Quadri Vs. Syed Abdul Raoof Quadri and Four ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 and 80 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Atiyat Enquiries Act, 1952; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 24; Muslim Wakfs Act - Sections 42, 56 and 63

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD522

Advocate for Respondent : V. Venkataramana, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; M.V. Ahmed, Adv. for Responsent No. 2 and; Mirza Saifullah Baig, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful first defendant being aggrieved of the reversing judgment and decree made in A.S. No. 71 of 1991 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Warangal, had preferred this Second...

Reliance Energy Limited and anr. Vs. Maharashtra State Road Developmen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226

Reported in : IV(2007)BC391(SC); 2007(6)BomCR677; 2007(2)CTLJ140(SC); JT2007(11)SC1; 2007(11)SCALE49; (2007)8SCC1; [2008]85SCL320(SC); 2007AIRSCW6416; 2007(8)SCC1; JT2007(11)SC1.

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Sr. Adv., ; Prashant Chavan, ; Varun Thakur

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. State of Maharashtra through Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (for short, 'MSRDC') floated Global Tender for completing Mumbai Trans Harbour Link ('MTHL') between Mumbai and Navi Mumbai on BOT basis.2. Reliance...

S.A. JalaluddIn Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 - Sections 4(1), 18, 18(1), 21(1), 27 and 27(2); Land Acquisition (Karnataka Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 - Sections 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR2003SC1258; JT2003(5)SC488; 2003(2)SCALE733; (2003)4SCC686; [2003]2SCR410

Advocate for Respondent : Altaf Ahmed, Additional Solicitor General, ; S.K. Kulkarni and ;

1. The above appeal has been filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 26th September, 1995 in RFA No. 232 of 1984 whereunder a challenge made to the Notification...

V.K. Udyog Ltd. Vs. Niaz Ahmed and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Present : The Hon’ble Justice Ashis Kumar Chakraborty 07.11.2014 GA2446of 2012 CS113of 2006 V.K.Udyog LTD.versus Niaz Ahmed & ORS.Mr.P.K.Ghosh, Senior Advocate Mr.Debashis Das, Advocate for the...

Janaki Busappa and ors. Vs. A.P. State Wakf Board and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 6, 83, 83(1), 83(5), 83(8), 83(9) and 89; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 10, 2 - Order 14 Rule 1

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT284

Advocate for Respondent : None for Respondent No. 1 and; Syed Shareef Ahmed, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri C.B. Rammohan Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioners and Sri Syed Shareef Ahmed, the learned Counsel representing respondent No. 2.2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 83(9)...

Om Parkash Sharma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR2000SC2335; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)957; 2000CriLJ3478; 2000(3)CTC55; JT2000(6)SC554; 2000(4)SCALE264; (2000)5SCC679

ORDERDoraiswamy Raju, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 4.1.99 in Criminal Revision No. 123/97, repelling a challenge made to...

State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 91, 173, 207, 207(1), 207(4), 207(5), 207(6), 207(7), 207(11), 207(14), 207A, 209, 227, 228, 228(1), 239, 240; Constitution of India - Article 14, 21 and 226; Income Tax Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2005SC359; 99(2005)CLT348(SC); 2005(1)CTC134; JT2004(10)SC303; 2005(1)KLT80(SC); 2005(I)OLR(SC)357; RLW2005(3)SC414; 2004(10)SCALE50; (2005)1SCC568; MANU/SC/1010/2004

Advocate for Respondent : U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv., ; Uday Gupta, ; Shivani M. Lal and

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Can the trial court at the time of framing of charge consider material filed by the accused, is the point for determination in these matters.2. In Satish Mehra v. Delhi Administration and Anr....