Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a a mane · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.337 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 06 1988

State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajendra Hilal Patil and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26 and 55; Forest (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR287

Advocate for Respondent : Rajiv J. Mane, Adv. for respondent No. 2

A.D. Tated, J.1. The State has preferred Criminal Revision Application No. 286 of 1988 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Shahada, ordering the return of the truck No. MWD 5480 to its owner Jagannath Shankar Badgujar....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1959

Umer Saheb Bura Saheb Inamdar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-1959

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 222, 222(2), 233, 234, 530 and 537

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1001

Advocate for Respondent : Y.V. Chandrachud, Govt. Pleader

SHAH, J.(1) After stating the facts his Lordship proceeded)- It is urded that the second head of the charge Infringed the express provision contained in the proviso to section 222(2) of the code of criminal Procedure,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1989

KamaluddIn Mohd. AmIn Siddique Vs. Asstt. Coll. of Customs

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-1989

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 123 and 135(1)

Reported in : 1989(24)ECC40; 1989(22)LC242(Bombay); 1989(41)ELT185(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Kher and ;C.M. Kothari, Public Prosecutors

H. Suresh, J.1. This is an application by Accused Nos. 1 and 2 to have the prosecution against them quashed on the ground that in a Customs enquiry they have been let off.2. The brief facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 18 1998

Kalyan Balasaheb Barungale Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : II(1998)DMC363

Advocate for Respondent : M.P. Galeria, Addl. P.P.

A.P. Shah, J.1. The appellant who has been convicted by the learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 106 of 1994 for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2006

Hanmanth S/O Bhimrao SaThe Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 11, 12(2), 18, 23, 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2) and 28; Land Acquisition Act, 1897 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR691; 2006(6)MhLj249

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Mane, A.G.P.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. The agricultural lands, situated at village Makni, taluka Omerga, district Osmanabad, were acquired by the State for public purpose i.e. of Lower Terna Project. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1996

Miss Rohini Mahavir Godse Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2), 173, 190(1) and 482

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR604; 1997BomCR(Cri)34

Advocate for Respondent : D.A. Nalawade, A.P.P. and ;T.E. Mane, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

V.P. Tipnis, J.1. The petitioner, who is a minor girl, 9 years old, represented by her father has challenged the legality and validity of a circular dated 16th August, 1995 issued by the then District &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

M/S. B.J.S. Finance and Leasing Company and Another Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 25, 27, 29, 60, 61, 62 and 63; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections 66(1)

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR601; 1999CriLJ4892

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Babhulgaonkar, A.P.P. and ;R.D. Mane, Adv.

ORDERV.K. Barde, J.1. Heard Mr. A.H. Kapadia, Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. K.M. Babhulgaonkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No. 1 - State; and Mr. R.D. Mane, Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.2. The facts,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1994

Mohmed Shafi Sardar Patel Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR514

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Patil, A.P.P. for State and ;T.E. Mane, Adv. for respondent No. 2

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 25-1-1993 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 91 of 1992 convicting him under section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2006

Dwarkabai W/O Karbhari Gangarde Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 11A, 18, 23(1A), 23(2) and 28A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 14, 96 and 100 - Order 47, Rules 1, 4, 7, 7(2), 7(3) and 8; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 4(1), 23A, 23A1 and 30(1)

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR132; 2006(6)MhLj604

Advocate for Respondent : R.R. Mane, A.G.P.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel Mr. P.M. Yelnurkar, instructed by learned Counsel Mr. M.P. Harjule, who appears for the appellant and learned A.G.P. Mrs. P.R. Mane for the respondent.2. This appeal is directed against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Prakashchand Bansilal Kankaria,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(2), 7, 20 and 21; Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981 - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 360 and 433; Providend Fund Accommodation Rules, 1955; Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1975

Reported in : 2004(1)MhLj806

Advocate for Respondent : T.E. Mane, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

1. This appeal is filed by the State against the Judgment and Order dated 29th April 1987 delivered by the Special Judge, Solapur in Criminal Case No. 1 of 1987 acquitting the respondents-accused of the offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial