Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a a joshi · Page 1 of about 18,013 results (0.527 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 08 2004

Gujarat Rajya Ardh Sakari Audhiyogick Karmachari Sangh Vs. State of Gu ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-08-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Labour [Regulations and Abolition] Act, 1970; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR480]; (2005)1GLR135

Advocate for Respondent : Nandini Joshi Asst. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Special Civil Application No. 7923 of 1996

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr.P.H. Pathak on behalf of the petitioners and learned AGP Ms.Nandini Joshi appearing on behalf of respondents.2. In these two petitions, the Dailywagers who are working with the Forest Department,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1997

Sri Sagarnahalli Revanna Vs. Govt. of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-03-1997

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Karnataka Corporation Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 121

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2227

Advocate for Respondent : K. Nagaraj, HCGP for R1, ;M.M. Joshi, Adv. for R2 and ;Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv. for R3

ORDERL. Sreenivasa Reddy, J.1. Heard counsel on both sides.2. The petitioner is one of the Directors of the second respondent-Federation. In this writ petition, he has challenged the order of the State Government dated 27-12-1996 (Annexure-A)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2004

Bajaj Auto Limited and ors. Vs. Sundeep Polymers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2004

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9A - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR792; 2006(1)CTLJ383(Bom); 2004(4)MhLj396

Advocate for Respondent : R.P. Joshi, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Admit. Shri R. P. Joshi, learned Counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondent. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 13 1999

Jayanti Nenumel Ramnani Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-13-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3192

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3

A.L. Dave, J.1. The petitioner came to be detained under the provisions of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (`PASA Act' for short) by virtue of an order passed by the Commissioner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2006

Dineshbhai @ Diliyo Harmanbhai Chauhan Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-07-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act - Sections 135; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 162, 302, 307 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 374 and 379

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4789

Advocate for Respondent : Nandini Joshi, APP

A.S. Dave, J.1. In this appeal, which is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, appellant, original accused No.1, has challenged judgment and order dated 22nd January 2001, passed by the learned 3rd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2003

Ram Prakash Jalan Vs. Nagaur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Urban Co-operative Banks Employees Services Rules, 1987 - Rules 2, 8(1) and 11; Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 75 and 128; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 12, 14, 16, 226

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1540; 2003(4)WLC116

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and; B.S. Bhati, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2007

State of Assam and ors. Vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Tobacco Product ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-30-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

B.P. Katakey, J.1. The State Legislature of Assam, on obtaining previous Presidential sanction under proviso to Article 304(b) of the Constitution, enacted the Assam Entry Tax Act, 2001 (Assam Act 4 of 2001)(in short, 'the principal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1970

Hingir Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : [1971]81ITR633(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : R.J. Joshi and ;G.N. Joshi, Advs.

Mody, J.1. This is a reference under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. 2. The assessee is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and owns a colliery at Rampur in Sambalpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2006

Pipla Education Society Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9; Secondary School Code - Sections 97.2

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR410; [2006(111)FLR942]; 2006(5)MhLj558

Advocate for Respondent : Joshi, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 3

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Mr. Shelat, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No. 1 to 3.2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 31-12-1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1999

Assam Bengal Carriers Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-23-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 115J, 115J(1A), 234B and 234C; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 205

Advocate for Respondent : G.K. Joshi, Senior Adv. and U. Bhuyan, Adv.

D.N. Chowdhury, J. 1. This reference, at the instance of the assessee, revolves around the special provisions relating to certain companies spelt out in Section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, that has emerged out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial