Advanced Search Results
M. and Vs. Rupchand Jitaji and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-30-1947
Service
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38, 47, 60 and 151; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6
AIR1950Bom155
B. Moropanth and ;Homi Engineer, Advs. for Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 3
Jahagirdar, J.1. The facts out of which this application arises are simple and undisputed.2. Opponents Nos. 1-3 filed Suit no. 733 of 1944 in the Small Causes Court at Poona against opponent No. 4 who is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras and Southern Mahratta Railway Vs. Rupchand Jitaji and Co.
Mumbai
Oct-30-1947
Contract
(1949)51BOMLR1020a
Jahagirdar, J.1. The facts out of which this application arises are simple and undisputed.2. Opponents Nos. 1-3 filed Suit No. 733 of 3 944 in the Small Causes Court at Poona against opponent No. 4 who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhalchandra Laxman and ors. Vs. Balkrishna Narayan and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-19-1951
Family
Hindu Law
AIR1952Bom162; (1952)54BOMLR52; ILR1952Bom317
A.A. Adarkar and ;H.S. Mandrekar, Advs.
Bhagwati, J.[1]. These two first appeals are filed against at the judgment of the learned 2nd Joint First Class Subordinate Judge of Kolhapur who decreed the plaintiff's suit. One Madhav Narayan Potnis died in the year...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Purshottam Dattaraya Shetye Vs. Yeshvadabai Jayadeo Shetye
Mumbai
Nov-16-1934
Land Acquisition
156Ind.Cas.381
ORDERBroomfield, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of remand made by the District Judge of Ratnagiri on appeal from the Subordinate Judge of Malvan in certain execution proceedings. There had been a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDnynoba Gangaram Vs. Dattoba Balappa
Mumbai
Mar-20-1946
PropertyLimitation
AIR1947Bom152; (1946)48BOMLR629
Lokur, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit to enforce a mortgage bond passed by the defendant in favour of one Eknath for Rs. 3,000, dated May 25, 1923. The plaintiff got the mortgage-deed assigned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernor General of India in Council Vs. the Jubilee Mills Ltd.
Mumbai
Feb-05-1952
Contract
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47(1) and 72; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 149, 152 and 161; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Railways Rules - Rule 2
AIR1953Bom46; (1952)54BOMLR652; ILR1953Bom242
C.K. Shah and ;S.M. Adhikari, Advs.
FACTS The Jubilee Mills Limited (plaintiff) was a limited company who purchased cotton through the commission agency of Motabhai Gulabdas, a firm of commission agent in Surat. Out of the cotton thus purchased a quantity of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAswIn Shambhuprasad Patel and ors. Vs. National Rayon Corporation Ltd.
Mumbai
Oct-01-1954
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rules 1, 2 and 5; Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 8; Bombay Pleaders Act, 1920 - Sections 9
AIR1955Bom262; (1955)57BOMLR209
V.B. Rege, Adv.
ORDER1. A question of very great importance to the Bar has been rained by Mr. Bengeri on this petition. The petitioner gave a general power-of-attorney to one Shambhuprasad in a civil revision application and when the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGangaram Ranaba Vs. Datto Appaji Powar and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-14-1955
Property
Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 32, 35, 58, 59, 60, 73, 75, 75(1), 75(2) and 75(3)
AIR1956Bom328; (1956)58BOMLR161; ILR1956Bom258
V.H. Gumaste, Adv.
Chainani, J.1. The facts which are material for decision of this appeal are briefly these: The suit house originally belonged to defendants Nos. 1 and 2. On 5th July 1946, they agreed to sell this house...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSilver Park âaâ Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Distri ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Apr-02-2009
Land Acquisition
Oral Order: Per Mr. P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1) Being aggrieved by the judgment and award passed by the District Consumer Forum, Thane in Consumer Complaint No.449/2007 decided on 23/1/2007, the original O.P.No.1 has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUrmi Deepak Kadia Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-11-2015
Land Acquisition
S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a declaration that section 7(15)(d) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (for short âthe MRC Actâ?)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »