Advanced Search Results

V. Sudarshan S/O Late T.S. Venkobarao and ors. Vs. Bangalore Developme ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 2(15), 28A, 28B, 28B(2), 28C, 29, 40, 41 and 62A; Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 7; Bangalore Development Authority and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2002; Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 57, 58, 59 and 103 to 106; City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 - Sections 20, 20A, 20B and 20C; Bangalore City Planning Area Zonal Regulations (Amendment and Validation) Act 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 265; Bangalore Development Authority and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ217; ILR2008(1)Kar1014; 2008(1)KCCRSN75; 2008(2)AIRKarR466

B.D.A. the power to impose, asses and collect tax, cess and fee notwithstanding the notification issued by the State Government under the said provision without corresponding services compulsions. The notification issued by the Government under Section 29 … 2002 (Karnataka Act No. 19 of 2002) published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 9th September 2002, as ultra vires the Constitution of India and to strike down the same, the said application is allowed. Therefore, the fate … additional prayer, to declare that the Bangalore Development Authority and Certain other Law (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Karnataka Act No. 19 of 2002) published in the

V. Kishore Kumar Vs. the State of A.P. Through the Secretary, Law (Cts ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24; Indain Bar Council Rules - Rule 36

Reported in : 1991(2)ALT589

petition.2. The writ petition was filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the sole respondent viz, State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Secretary, Law (Courts) Department directing the respondent to issue a fresh notification … writ petition.2. The writ petition was filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the sole respondent viz, State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Secretary, Law (Courts) Department directing the respondent to issue a fresh

M/S. Thiru Muruga Finance Rep. by Its Partner Sri V. Thirunavukkarasu, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 - Sections 15; Constitution of India -- Articles 14, 19 (1)(G), 21, 246 and 254(2) -- Schedule VII; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Reserve Bank of India Act (amended), 1997; Tamil Nadu Act, 1997 -- Sections 45; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 -- Sections 5; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Companies Act, 1958 -- Sections 58A; State Bank of India (Subsidary Banks) Act, 1959; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 -- Sections 3; Industrial Development Bank of India Act, 1964 -- Sections 6A; Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 2; Hire-Purchase Act, 1972 -- Sections 2; Indain Partnership Act, 1932; Code of Cri

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC609

this amount, about 40 per cent matured for payment and others not matured for payment. It is further stated that the value of asset in the form of immovable properties of the petitioner firm and the sister … ORDER1. All these writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 (Tamil Nadu Act XIV of … Act. The first respondent is also not competent to make the said law, which is draconian in character. The said Act is therefore ultra vires,

Smt. C.V. Chitra Wife of Prasad Rao M.L. and ors. Vs. the State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka State Civil Services Act, 1978 - Sections 3(2) and 8; Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3(12), 23 and 23(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 98, 146, 146(2), 148, 148(5), 187, 229, 229(2), 233, 233(2), 234, 235, 245, 309, 311, 324 and 324(5); Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 - Rule 4; Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1983; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(7) and 3(50); General Clauses Regulations

the written examination.3. The facts relevant for the purpose of appreciating the questions raised in this writ petition, stated in nutshell, are that the recruitment to the post of Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) earlier known as Munsiffs … for applications, according to which enrollment as Advocate is an essential qualification. The applicants have also challenged the validity of the Recruitment Rules, 2004, in so far as they require that enrollment as Advocate is an essential … Rules was that the applicant must be holder of a degree in Law or equivalent qualification and must on the last date fixed for submission

State of Kerala, Rep. by Deputy Commissioner (Law), Commercial Taxes, ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. This revision by the State raises the question whether the impugned order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal is perverse, unreasonable and against … only, whereas the conceded profit for the second half was 60.40%. The assessee had no explanation for the vast difference in the profit during the two half years. The Intelligence Squad had recovered 22 (twenty two) business … order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal is perverse, unreasonable and against law inasmuch as the Tribunal failed to exercise its jurisdiction by not interfering

Biju.V Vs. the State Police Chief (Law and Order)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

AT "SURESH BHAVAN", MOONNALAM, ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 691 523. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SETHUKUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:-: --------------------------- 1. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF (LAW & ORDER), POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. 2.PATHANAMTHITTA, THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, PATHANAMTHITTA … -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March, 2014 JUDGMENT ANTONY DOMINIC, J.Petitioner claims that, daughter of respondents 5 and 6, Dhanya Mohan is his legally wedded wife and that the marriage was solemnized on 03/03/2012. He

“5. Applying the Above Said Proposition of Law Vs. State of Haryana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-21913 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:04. 07.2014. Naresh Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr. Narender Kaajla, Advocate for the petitioner. *** … OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-21913 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:04. 07.2014. Naresh Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr. Narender Kaajla, Advocate for the petitioner. … allowed by assigning the following reasons:-“5. Applying the above said proposition of law to the facts in hand and after going through the records, it

Nandan N V vs Karnataka State Law University

Court : Karnataka

CROSS, RAMAIAH LAYOUT, BYRATHI, DR. SRK NAGAR POST, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT PUTHUKUDI HOUSE, ERANHIKKAL P.O. KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE - 673 303. Digitally signed …PETITIONER by JUANITA THEJESWINI (BY SRI. MAHESH N, FOR Location: HIGH SRI. BIJOY … 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19901 OF 2025 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: NANDAN N. V., S/O.LATE RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS STUDENT, KRISTU JAYANTI COLLEGE OF LAW, BANGALORE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT # 531,