Advanced Search Results

Yog Raj Sudan and Kuldeep Singh Jasrotia Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Appellant : Yog Raj Sudan and Kuldeep Singh Jasrotia

Respondent : State of J and K

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 - Section 5(1) and 5(2); ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 120B; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 342; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 409

Reported in : 2005(2)JKJ491

S.K. Gupta, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment of the learned Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, Jammu dated 16.05.1992 whereby he has held both the appellants guilty under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,...

Yog Raj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Yog Raj;rohtas Singh;bhupinder Singh

Respondent : State;state;state

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT249

P.K. Babri, J. (1) These three appeals which arise from the judgment dated September 21, 1988, of an Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi. convicting the appellants for various offences and subsequent order dated September 23, 1988,...

Yog Raj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Yog Raj

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154

Reported in : 22(1982)DLT9

M.L. Jain, J.(1) This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellant Yog Raj under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and further...

Yog Raj Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Yog Raj;davinder Singh;avtar Singh

Respondent : State;state;state

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Arms Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1908 - Sections 399 and 402

Reported in : 1985(9)DRJ297

Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) As common questions of law and fact arise in these three appeals, this judgment will cover all of them. (2) The appellants, namely. Yog Raj, appellant in Cr. A. 166, Davinder Singh...

Yog Raj Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Yog Raj

Respondent : State of Punjab and Others

Subject : Education

C.M.No.1437 of 2013 and CWP No.20817 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.M.No.1437 of 2013 and CWP No.20817 of 2012 Date of Decision : February 06, 2013 Yog Raj ...PETITIONER versus...

Yog Raj Shah Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Yog Raj Shah

Respondent : The State of Punjab and ors.

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922

Reported in : (1996)113PLR163

T.H.B. Challapathi, J.1. This writ petition is filed challenging the award passed by the Land Acquisition Tribunal constituted under the Punjab Improvement Town Act, Jallandhar, dated 8.4.1981. The land of the petitioner was acquired Under Section...

Yog Raj Arora Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Yog Raj Arora

Respondent : The State and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 249 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 467 and 471

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT675; 2002(64)DRJ89

S.K. Agarwal, J. 1. By this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking setting aside of order dated 26th April, 2001 passed by the court of Shri S.S. Rathi, Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi summoning the...

Yog Raj Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Yog Raj

Respondent : State of H.P.

Subject : Food Adulteration

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC353

V.K. Gupta, C.J.1. This Criminal Revision Petition under Sections 397 and 401, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 23rd January, 2001 passed...

Yog Raj and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Yog Raj and ors.

Respondent : State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, the same are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Petitioners have assailed...