Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: triloki nath · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 28 2005

Triloki Nath and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Triloki Nath and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P.

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 96, 97 to 106, 141, 142, 147, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323, 326, 352 and 425

Reported in : AIR2006SC321; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)1; JT2005(9)SC370; (2005)13SCC323

S.B. Sinha, J.1. These appeals arising out of a common judgment and order dated 22nd April, 2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Crl. Appeal No. 660 of 1981 and Crl. Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2009

Triloki Nath Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Triloki Nath

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Decided on : May-11-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2601

S.U. Khan, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition is directed against order dated 19.7.1999, passed in Case No. 512 of 1998, State of U.P. v. Triloki Nath. The order was passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2011

Triloki Nath MishrA. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Appellant : Triloki Nath MishrA.

Respondent : The State of Jharkhand.

Decided on : Apr-26-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 438(2)

1. Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Triloki Nath Mishra is moved by Sri Jai Shankar Tiwary and opposed by Mr. R.S. Singh , learned Additional P.P.2. It is alleged that petitioner issued a cheque of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 1950

Triloki Nath Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Triloki Nath

Respondent : State

Decided on : Apr-28-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 297; Defence of India Rules - Rule 81 and 81(2); Uttar Pradesh Ghee (Movement) Control Order, 1945 - Sections 3; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 5, 7, 8 and 17(2); Defence of India Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1950All657

ORDERRaghubar Dayal, J.1. This is a revision by Triloki Nath against the order of the Sessions Judge, Meerut confirming the conviction under Section 7, Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Ordinance, 1946, read with Section 3, U. P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1992

Triloki Nath Dubey Vs. Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport Cor ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Triloki Nath Dubey

Respondent : Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Decided on : Jul-16-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ388All

R.B. Mehrotra, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has claimed that the petitioner is admittedly senior to one Sri Shyam Behari, a conductor in U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Varanasi Region, Varanasi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2008

Sri Sai Stone Crusher, Partnership Firm Through Its Partner, Rajeev Ku ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Sri Sai Stone Crusher, Partnership Firm Through Its Partner, Rajeev Kumar S/O Triloki Nath and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Forest Department and ors.

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Subject : Environment

Reported in : AIR2008All186

Sushil Harkauli and Sudhir Agarwal, JJ.1. The petitioners having registered stone crushers situated at various places in District Bijnor have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the collection and demand...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2012

Triloki Nath Guha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Triloki Nath Guha

Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-2012

Subject : Education

WRIT PETITION No.16628/201”08. 10.2012 Shri Amit Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents-State on advance copy. It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the case of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1990

Triloki Nath Pandey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Triloki Nath Pandey and Etc.

Respondent : State of U.P. and Others

Decided on : Apr-30-1990

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 134-A, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2 and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 2(7) - Order XXVII, Rules 4 and 8-B; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules - Rules 1, 2, 99, 103 and 162; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Act - Sections 7 and 9; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 7-B, 241 and 241(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 114

Reported in : AIR1990All143; (1990)1UPLBEC542

ORDERV. N. Khare, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law in this writ petition and in the connected writ petitions are involved, we propose to decide these writ petitions by a common judgment.2. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1961

Triloki Nath Sinha Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Triloki Nath Sinha

Respondent : State

Decided on : Apr-16-1961

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 155(2), 173, 190(1), 200 and 529; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 110

Reported in : AIR1962Raj94

ORDERSarjoo Prosad, C.J. 1. This is a reference made by Shri Chander Singh Moratia, Sessions Judge of Ganganagar, for quashing an order of conviction under Section 110 of the Indian Railways Act, passed against the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2006

Triloki Nath Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Triloki Nath

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Decided on : Feb-23-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC377

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Rajendra Rai, advocate on behalf of the petitioner and learned standing counsel on behalf of respondents.2. From the records of the present writ petition, it is apparently clear that the services...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial