Advanced Search Results
The West End Watch Co. Vs. the Berna Watch Co.
Mumbai
The West End Watch Co.
Nov-22-1910
Intellectual Property Rights
(1911)13BOMLR212
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. The plaintiffs sue to restrain the defendants from using and imitating various trade symbols alleged to belong to the plaintiffs and from representing that the defendants' business is the business carried on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitan Watches Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Titan Watches Ltd.
Feb-06-1998
MRTP
(1999)(110)ELT834TriDel
1. These are two appeals filed by M/s. Titan Watches Ltd., Bangalore, aggrieved with the two separate orders passed by the Collector of Customs, Bangalore. As common issues are involved in both the appeals, they were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii
Aug-23-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(84)ECC95
1. This appeal has been filed by M/s. HMT Watch Factory I & II Jalahalli, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as HMT) against the Order-in-Original passed by the Collector of Customs, Bangalore. (a) On 26.10.90, the Officers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii
Aug-23-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(105)LC902Tri(Bang.)alore
1. This appeal has been filed by M/s HMT Watch Factory I & II, Jalahalli, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as HMT) against the Order-in-Original passed by the Collector of Customs, Bangalore. (a) On 26.10.1990, the Officers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStandard Watch Co. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Standard Watch Co.
Mar-08-1990
Land Acquisition
(1990)LC310Tri(Delhi)
1. The learned counsel stated that this is an appeal against the order of Addl. Collector of Customs, New Delhi.2. The DRI officers have searched their residential premises and recovered inter alia 19600 watches.3. Subsequently 18540...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElgIn National Watch Co. Vs. Illinois Watch Case Co.
US Supreme Court
ElgIn National Watch Co.
Jan-07-1901
Land Acquisition
Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co. - 179 U.S. 665 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co., 179 U.S. 665 (1901) Elgin National Watch Company v. Illinois...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTitan Watches Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Titan Watches Ltd.
Jun-01-1993
Customs
1994(46)ECC117; 1994(69)ELT22(Mad)
ORDER1. Broadly speaking, in all these matters, a common question of law arises for consideration. In fact, common arguments were advanced by learned Counsel on both sides, and hence these matters are disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaito Watch Manufacturing Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Taito Watch Manufacturing
Aug-08-1984
Customs
(1984)(18)ELT626TriDel
2. In appeal No. 2095/83, Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur by his order dated 16-5-1983, demanded differential Customs duty amounting to Rs. 5,94,075.90 and imposed personal penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/-, under Section 112 of the Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVikas Watch Manufacturing Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Vikas Watch Manufacturing
May-18-1984
Land Acquisition
(1984)(18)ELT21TriDel
1. The question for decision in this appeal is correctness of demand of duty and imposition of penalty by the Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur on the appellants by his order dated 16th May, 1983. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRochees Watches Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Rochees Watches Ltd. and ors.
May-06-2005
Service Tax
(2006)(197)ELT218TriDel
1. The above captioned appeals have been directed against the common order-in-Original vide which different amounts of duties with penalties had been confirmed against the appellants by the adjudicating authority.2. Proceedings against all the appellants were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »