Advanced Search Results
The Kate
US Supreme Court
The Kate
Nov-30-1896
Land Acquisition
The Kate - 164 U.S. 458 (1896) U.S. Supreme Court The Kate, 164 U.S. 458 (1896) The Kate No. 106 Argued January 6-7, 1896 Decided November 30, 1896 164 U.S. 458 CERTIORARI FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDashrath Rao Kate Vs. Brij Mohan Srivastava
Supreme Court of India
Dashrath Rao Kate
Nov-03-2009
CivilTenancy
Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 12(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47 - Order 22, Rule 5
AIR2010SC897; 2009(4)AWC3983(SC); JT2009(14)SC20; 2010(I)OLR(SC)84; 2009(13)SCALE519; (2010)1SCC277:2009AIRSCW6850:2009(6)LHSC3740.
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The judgment of the High Court, allowing the Second Appeal is in challenge by way of this Appeal. The Second Appeal was filed by the respondent/defendant challenging the judgment of the Appellate Court,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDashrath Rao Kate Vs. Brij Mohan Srivastava
Supreme Court of India
Dashrath Rao Kate
Aug-06-2009
Civil
V.S. SIRPURKAR, J. 1. The judgment of the High Court, allowing the Second Appeal is in challenge by way of this Appeal. The Second Appeal was filed by the respondent/defendant challenging the judgment of the Appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Narayan Tukaram Kate Vs. Hirabai Ramchandra Godse (Deceased) and ors.
Mumbai
Narayan Tukaram Kate
Jul-09-2008
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1), 15 15(1) and 16; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 2 and 3; Hindu law
2008(5)BomCR662; (2008)110BOMLR2364; 2008(6)MhLj64
J.H. Bhatia, J.1. This Second Appeal is preferred by the original defendant No. 4 after having failed in the Regular Civil Appeal No. 203 of 1986 filed against the judgment passed by the IInd Joint Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShridhar Dada Kate (Dr.) Vs. Usha Shridhar Kate
Mumbai
Shridhar Dada Kate (Dr.)
Jul-30-1986
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1A) and 23
1986(3)BomCR676; 1987MhLJ81
Sharad Manohar, J.1. This is a petition for divorce filed by the petitioner/husband (who was the petitioner also in the trial Court, but was the respondent in the earlier matrimonial proceedings between the same parties).For the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKate Munda Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Kate Munda
Apr-08-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 326
93(2002)CLT781
B. Panigrahi, J. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment/order dated 19.4.1995 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sundargarh, in Sessions Trial No. 66 of 1 994, convicting the appellant under Section 449/302/326 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Kumra Kate Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mahendra Kumra Kate
Oct-15-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(185)ELT222Tri(Mum.)bai
1. For the sake of brevity the full facts are not recorded here. The Tribunal in its order No. C-1/2045-50/02 WZB dt. 24.7.02 disposed off an appeal arising out of the same order as in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadu Rowji Kate Vs. Jijai Laxman Misal
Mumbai
Mahadu Rowji Kate
Nov-29-1927
Civil
(1928)30BOMLR443; 110Ind.Cas.120
Madgavkah, J.1. The question in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs-respondents are entitled to the removal of the dam A in the plan Exh. 106 made by the defendants-appellants so as to allow the plaintiffs-respondents the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshabai Kate (Sau.) Vs. Vithal Bhika Nade
Mumbai
Ashabai Kate (Sau.)
Oct-17-1989
Family
1990(3)BomCR229; (1989)91BOMLR177
Lalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. This appeal by the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the decision of the Bombay High Court dismissing her suit for possession of the properties detailed in the plaint.2. The disputed properties belonged to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSau Ashabai Kate Vs. Vithal Bhika Nade
Supreme Court of India
Sau Ashabai Kate
Oct-17-1989
PropertyCivil
Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2); Hindu Succession Act - Sections 14(1)
AIR1990SC670; 1990(38)BLJR619; I(1990)DMC45SC; (1990)2GLR797; JT1989(4)SC163; 1990MPLJ44(SC); 1989(2)SCALE866; 1989Supp(2)SCC450; [1989]Supp1SCR464
Lalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. This appeal by the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the decision of the Bombay High Court dismissing her suit for possession of the properties detailed in the plaint.2. The disputed properties belonged to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »