Advanced Search Results
Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Mohinder Singh;surat Singh
State of Haryana;state of Haryana
Mar-05-1974
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 120-B, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 474
AIR1974SC873; 1974CriLJ742; (1974)4SCC285; [1974]3SCR519
H.R. Khanna, J.1. Surat Singh and Mohinder Singh Advocate were tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge Karnal for various offences. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted Surat Singh under Section 409 Indian Penal Code,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Vs. State
Delhi
Surat Singh
State
Apr-06-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 45 and 47
1995CriLJ3189
S.D. Pandit, J.1. Lance Naik Surat Singh has preferred the present appeal against the order of conviction passed against him by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 42/88. The Additional Sessions Judge has found...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Surat Singh and anr.
State of Punjab
Aug-13-1976
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 324
AIR1977SC705; 1977CriLJ347; (1976)4SCC311; 1977(9)LC76(SC)
N.L. Uutwalia, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970, by two persons who have been convicted by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Surat Singh Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Surat Singh
The State of Punjab
Jan-13-1981
Criminal
1981CriLJ585
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. Whether upon the receipt of a report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Magistrate has jurisdiction to differ with the conclusions of the police and direct that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Surat Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.
May-26-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 and 34
2003(3)ARBLR606(HP)
V.K. Gupta, C.J. 1. This reference in terms of Section 113 read with Order 46, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been made to this Court by the learned Senior Sub Judge, Shimla....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Surat Singh
State of Haryana
Jul-29-2013
Education
CRM not M-13349 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-13349 of 2013 Date of Decision:- 29.07.2013 Surat Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKameshwar Mahto and ors. and Ram Surat Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bih ...
Patna
Kameshwar Mahto and ors. and Ram Surat Singh and anr.
State of Bihar and ors.
Apr-08-2004
ServiceContempt of Court
Service Law
Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In the M.J.C. application, prayer is to initiate contempt proceeding against the Opposite parties, namely, Managing Director of Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board') for alleged wilful...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Surat Singh and ors.
State of Haryana
May-13-1999
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23
(2000)124PLR832
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. State of Haryana with an intention to achieve the public purpose for developing and utilising the land for development of Industrial Area in Sector 32 under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Surat Singh
State of Haryana and Others
Jan-25-1990
Tenancy
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 7, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and (3), 18 and 18(3); Constitution of India - Article 14; Punjab Urban Estate (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 3, 3(2), 8-A, 8-A(1) and 58 and 58(2); Punjab Urban Estate (Sale of Sites) Rules, 1965
AIR1991P& H112
ORDERS.S. Sodhi, J.1. The matter here pertains to the use or rather misuse of residential sites and buildings in the Faridabad Complex and Panchkula for a non-residential purpose, namely commercial, by running shops there.2. This bunch...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurat Singh Thakur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Surat Singh Thakur
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Nov-08-2012
Education
surat singh versus State 1 W.P.No.18508/2012 8/11/2012 Shri Amit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the employer to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »