Advanced Search Results

Suman Vs. State of Ut Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Suman

Respondent : State of Ut Chandigarh

Subject : Criminal

CRA No.2978-SB of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.2978-SB of 2011 Date of Decision :30. 4.2013 Suman .......Appellant Versus State of UT, Chandigarh .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...

Suman Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Suman

Respondent : State of Maharashtra

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : I(2008)DMC449

K.J. Rohee, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 259 of 1993 is preferred by accused No. 3 Suman w/o Pralhad Ghodke challenging her conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 306 and 304B of the Indian Penal...

Suman @ Mohd Hasan vs.state

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Suman @ Mohd Hasan

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h September, 2018 Decided on:4. h October, 2018 CRL.A. 981/2017 SUMAN @ MOHD HASAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate...

Suman and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Suman and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25(1B); ;Evidence Act - Sections 25, 27 and 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2000CriLJ528

J.C. Misra, J. 1. The IIIrd Addl. Sessions Judge, Binjore, had tried the following six cases together :--(a) S. T. No. 370 of 1995, in which all the present appellants in the above two appeals stood...

Natha Ram Suman vs.state (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Natha Ram Suman

Respondent : State (Cbi)

Subject : Land Acquisition

* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h March, 2017 Decided on:5. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 134/2016 OM PRAKASH Represented by: Mr. Devashish Maharishi, for ..... Appellant...

Suman Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Suman

Respondent : State of Rajasthan and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 164, 156(3), 169, 190(l), 193, 207A, 209, 319, 319(1), 319(4), 351, 351(1), 351(2), 468, 473 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 201, 219, 302, 308, 323, 354, 377, 406, 452 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207A, 351 and 351(1)

Reported in : AIR2010SC518; JT2009(14)SC169; 2009(13)SCALE716; (2010)1SCC250

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the appellant, who was named as one of the accused in the complaint lodged by respondent No. 2, Smt. Anita alleging harassment and torture at the hands of her husband...

Suman Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Suman

Respondent : State of Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2010CriLJ793

Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. By filing this criminal appeal under Section 374, Cr. P.C. the accused appellant has challenged the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 4-10-1991 passed by learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge,...

“19. the Dead Body of Suman Was Found Lying in the Vs. State of Hary ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : “19. the Dead Body of Suman Was Found Lying in the

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Criminal

CRM-A No.969-MA of 2012 (O &M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-A No.969-MA of 2012 (O & M) Date of decision :18. 2.2013 Sunil Kumar ........Applicant-appellant versus State of...

Suman Chatterjee vs.the State & Ors

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Suman Chatterjee

Respondent : The State & Ors

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September , 2017 TEST.CAS. 9/2010 SUMAN CHATTERJEE ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, Adv. * % + versus THE STATE & ORS ........

Suman Yadav Gayasamandir and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Suman Yadav Gayasamandir and Another

Respondent : State of Maharashtra

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 511; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 45, 59, 61 and 101; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 160, 163, 165 and 313

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)275

ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. By the impugned judgment the Additional Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, found both the appellants guilty for offence under section 302 read with 34 I.P.C. and each were convicted to suffer imprisonment for...