Advanced Search Results
State of U.P. Vs. Sushil Kumar JaIn and ors.
Allahabad
State of U.P.
Sushil Kumar JaIn and ors.
May-23-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 198A and 323; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 4
2002CriLJ3667; I(2003)DMC297
Bhanwar Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated June 18,1991, passed by the then II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar. By virtue of the said verdict, the respondents were acquitted of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Sushil Kumar
Delhi
State
Sushil Kumar
Aug-01-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sectin 34, 302 and 394; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 8, 83 and 207
2006(92)DRJ165
R.S. Sodhi, J.1. By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of-Death Sentence Reference No. 1 of 2005 as also Criminal Appeal No. 762 of 2005. The State seeks to justify the judgment and order of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Sushil Kumar
Delhi
State
Sushil Kumar
Mar-10-2014
Criminal
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 203/2014 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State. versus SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sushil Kumar Vohra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Bihar State Road Transport Corporation
Sushil Kumar Vohra and ors.
Jan-21-1993
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 74(3)
I(1993)ACC367; 1993(2)BLJR918; 1993(1)SCALE171; (1993)3SCC91
1. This appeal by the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'Corporation') is directed against the judgment of the High Court of judicature at Patna, Ranchi Bench dated 10.10.1991. Sushil Kumar Vohra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWest Bengal State Warehousing Corporation and anr. Vs. Sushil Kumar Ka ...
Supreme Court of India
West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation and anr.
Sushil Kumar Kayan and ors.
May-03-2002
Arbitration
AIR2002SC2185; 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)251; 2002(2)ARBLR236(SC); (SCSuppl)2002(3)CHN137; JT2002(Suppl1)SC235; 2002(4)SCALE389; (2002)5SCC679
Bhan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The West Bengal State Warehousing Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') and TheSuperintendent, Oil Installation Warehouse have filed this appeal by special leave against the judgment and order passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sushil Kumar Patel
Madhya Pradesh
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Sushil Kumar Patel
Mar-12-2013
Education
1 W.A.No.1295/2012 State of M.P.& others Sushil Kumar Patel 12.3.2013 Shri Rahul Jain, Dy.AG for appellants. Shri R.N.Shrivastava and Shri Ghanshyam Sharma, Counsel for respondent I.A.No.14398/2012 for condonation of delay in filing this appeal Considering the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sushil Kumar
Madhya Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh
Sushil Kumar
Sep-26-1989
Motor Vehicles
I(1990)ACC139; 1990ACJ848
S.D. Zha, J. 1. The appellant, State of M.P., challenges acquittal of the respondent Sushil Kumar of charge under Section 304-A by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Mandleshwar (West Nimar) by judgment dated 2.11.1985.2. The respondent accused...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana Through Land Acquisition Officer Sco No.61 Vs. Dr. Su ...
Punjab and Haryana
State of Haryana Through Land Acquisition Officer Sco No.61
Dr. Sushil Kumar Jaiswal Son of Shri Shiv Charan Jaiswal
Dec-13-2012
Land Acquisition
RFA No.1624 of 2012(O&M) & Anr. [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 RFA No.1624 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:13. 12.2012 State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Officer, SCO No.61, Sector 8...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Sushil Kumar Natani
Rajasthan
State of Rajasthan and ors.
Sushil Kumar Natani
Aug-14-2001
Service
Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants (Dying while in Service) Rules, 1975 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 311-A
2001(3)WLC533; 2003(1)WLN545
Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). Heard Mr. Mohd. Rafiq, for the appellants; and Mr. V.D. Gathala, for the respondent. (2). The State of Rajasthan, through the Finance Commissioner-cum-Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan and two others are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sushil Kumar Patel Judgement Given By: ...
Madhya Pradesh
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Sushil Kumar Patel Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta
Jan-06-2014
Criminal
CRA No.3258/2013 Criminal Appeal No.3258/2013 6.1.2014 Shri S.D.Khan, G.A.for the State/appellant. Heard on admission. Vide judgment dated 10.4.2013, the learned JMFC, Maihar in criminal case No.889/2011 acquitted the respondent from the charges of offence punishable under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›