Advanced Search Results
State of H.P. Vs. Surinder Kumar.
Himachal pradesh
State of H.P.
Surinder Kumar.
Dec-21-2010
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 378(3), 154; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302
1. The present Criminal Appeal has come up for adjudication after the grant of leave to appeal under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in reference to judgment dated 27.9.2000, passed by Learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Surinder Kumar
Himachal Pradesh
State
Surinder Kumar
Sep-26-1975
Criminal
1976CriLJ892
ORDERChet Ram Thakur, J.1. This is a criminal reference under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 made by the Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, recommending the enhancement of the sentence for the offence under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab State Electricity Board Vs. Surinder Kumar
Punjab and Haryana
Punjab State Electricity Board
Surinder Kumar
Sep-24-2013
Land Acquisition
CR No.4515 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4515 of 2006 Reserved on:19.09.2013. Date of Decision: 24.09.2013. Punjab State Electricity Board ....Petitioner Versus Surinder Kumar .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Haryana Vs. Surinder Kumar
Supreme Court of India
State of Haryana
Surinder Kumar
Oct-15-1999
Criminal
(2000)10SCC337
G.T. Nanavati and; S.N. Phukan, JJ.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.4. On the basis of the facts and circumstances disclosed by the police statement, the trial court framed charge against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab and Others Vs. M/S. Surinder Kumar and Co. and Others
Supreme Court of India
State of Punjab and Others
M/S. Surinder Kumar and Co. and Others
Dec-11-1996
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11
AIR1997SC809; JT1997(1)SC393; (1997)115PLR779; 1997(1)SCALE151; (1997)9SCC66; [1996]Supp9SCR963
1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, dated May 29,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana Vs. Surinder Kumar and Others
Supreme Court of India
State of Haryana
Surinder Kumar and Others
Mar-10-1997
ConstitutionService
AIR1997SC2129; JT1997(4)SC82; RLW1997(1)SC162; 1997(3)SCALE108; (1997)3SCC633; [1997]2SCR917
1. Order dated 2.8.1996 is recalled. Special Leave Petitions are restored.2. Leave granted. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, dated November 23....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab and Others Vs. Surinder Kumar and Others
Supreme Court of India
State of Punjab and Others
Surinder Kumar and Others
Dec-20-1991
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 142
AIR1992SC1593; [1992]73CompCas490(SC); [1992]194ITR434(SC); JT1991(6)SC540; 1991(1)SCALE1429; (1992)1SCC489; [1991]Supp3SCR553
ORDERLalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. This special leave petition is directed against the order of the High Court dated 4.4.1991 disposing of a writ petition filed by the present two respondents. The entire judgment reads thus:On the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of H.P. and ors. Vs. Surinder Kumar Mohindra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
State of H.P. and ors.
Surinder Kumar Mohindra and ors.
Nov-07-1996
Service
Constitution of India - Article 16
1996VIIIAD(SC)525; AIR1997SC2449; JT1996(10)SC342; 1996(8)SCALE267; (1996)11SCC650; [1996]Supp8SCR564; 1997(1)SLJ137(SC); 1997(1)LC409(SC)
G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. This Appeal by Special Leave is directed against the judgment of the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. By the impugned judgment the Tribunal called upon the State to consider promotion of respondent No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›