Advanced Search Results
State Vs. Sardara
Rajasthan
State
Sardara
Mar-21-1973
Criminal
1974CriLJ43
L.S. Mehta, J.1. The prosecution story in brief is that Kanhaiya Lal Periwal, P. W. 17, a resident of Nohar, had a son Naresh and a daughter Sarita. Naresh was about 5 1/2 years' old and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Sardara Singh and ors.
Rajasthan
State
Sardara Singh and ors.
Mar-01-1968
Criminal
1970CriLJ558
L.S. Mehta, J.1. There is a village Jagtewala, Chak No. 27 H. in Tehsil Karanpur, District Ganganagar. In this village the accused Sardara Singh. Kela Singh, Jaila Singh and Pal Singh possessed certain Marrabas of land....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Sardara and ors.
Rajasthan
The State of Rajasthan
Sardara and ors.
May-01-1980
Criminal
1980WLN(UC)204
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The respondents were tried for the offences under Sections 148, 342/149 and 452, Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sirohi, who by his judgment dated May 25, 1970 acquitted all the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sardara Singh
Supreme Court of India
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sardara Singh
Aug-27-2008
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378, 378(1), 378(2), 378(3) and 378(5); Constitution of India - Article 141
2008(2)ALD(Cri)627; 2008(229)ELT496(SC); 2008(11)SCALE772; (2008)9SCC392; 2008(3)ShimLC236; 2008AIRSCW5937; 2008(4)Crimes52; 2008(6)Supreme153; ILR2008(4)Kar3977
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissing the application filed by the State in terms of Section 378(3)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›