Advanced Search Results

State of H.P. Vs. Raj Kumar Chopra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of H.P.;m.L. Chadha

Respondent : Raj Kumar Chopra and anr.;raj Kumar Chopra and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : JT1994(3)SC291; 1994(2)SCALE601; 1994Supp(2)SCC318; 1994(1)LC773(SC)

1. These two appeals, one by the State and the other by Shri M.L. Chadha, father of the deceased, are filed against the judgment of the High Court acquitting the respondents-accused. The trial court convicted them...

State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Raj Kumar@raju and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State (Nct of Delhi)

Respondent : Raj Kumar@raju and Anr.

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.221/2015 Date of decision:8. h April 2015 % ………. Petitioner STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, ASC for the State...

State of West Bengal Vs. Raj Kumar Agarwalla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of West Bengal

Respondent : Raj Kumar Agarwalla

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439

Reported in : AIR1977SC301; (1976)2SCC204; 1976(8)LC151(SC)

H.R. Khanna, J.1. This appeal be special leave is by the State of West Bengal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court whereby the High Court in a revision petition under Section 439 of the...

State Vs. Raj Kumar Khandelwal

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State;raj Kumar Khandelwal

Respondent : Raj Kumar Khandelwal;state

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 106; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41, 313, 366, 367 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT713

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Vide judgment and order dated 14.2.2008, Raj Kumar Khandelwal, hereinafter referred to as the accused, has been convicted for the offence of murdering his wife Anita and his three minor daughters; Kumari Alisha...

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Raj Kumar and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : State of Himachal Pradesh

Respondent : Raj Kumar and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Sections 173, 207; Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(2)

1. State has appealed against the judgment, dated 30.3.2009, of learned Special Judge, Chamba, whereby respondent Raj Kumar and Bhupinder Singh, who were charged with and tried for offences, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B...

State Vs. Raj Kumar@ Dhanwant and ors

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State

Respondent : Raj Kumar@ Dhanwant and ors

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 447/2013 % Judgment dated 02.09.2013 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Adv. SI Mohinder Singh, Special Cell. versus RAJ KUMAR@ DHANWANT &...

State of Bihar Vs. Raj Kumar Choudhary

Court : Patna

Appellant : State of Biharraj Kumar Choudhary

Respondent : Raj Kumar Choudharystate of Bihar

Subject : Criminal

B.P. Singh, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the sole appellant-Raj Kumar Choudhary who has been found guilty of the offences under Sections 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code by the 2nd...

Biri Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Biri Singh;state of U.P.

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.;raj Kumar and ors.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97, 147, 148, 302, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1510; 1992(1)Crimes1000(SC); JT1992(2)SC229; 1992(1)SCALE558; 1992Supp(2)SCC264

1. All the above three appeals are directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 9th April 1979 rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 234/79 connected with Criminal Appeal No. 210/79 whereby the High Court...

State and Raj Kumar Vs. Raj Kumar and State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State and Raj Kumar

Respondent : Raj Kumar and State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 118; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2001IAD(Delhi)285; 88(2000)DLT428; 2000(55)DRJ749; 2001(1)JCC29

ORDERArijit Passayat, C.J.1. This Murder Reference under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in short, the Code) and appeal are interlinked being in respect of judgment of learned Additional Session Judge, Delhi in Session'...

The State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Raj Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : The State of Himachal Pradesh

Respondent : Raj Kumar

Subject : Criminal

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.31 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1204 of 2015) REPORTABLE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH …Appellant RAJ KUMAR ...Respondent Versus JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This...