Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: state · Respondent: m · Page 1 of about 1,219 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 20 1999

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. M.S.R.T. Kamgar Sangh ...

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Respondent : M.S.R.T. Kamgar Sanghatana

Decided on : Jul-20-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30(2)

Reported in : (1999)IILLJ1082Bom

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the finding by the Industrial Court that no unfair labour practice has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2003

Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. K.M. Somashekar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Karnataka State Financial Corporation

Respondent : K.M. Somashekar and ors.

Decided on : Nov-11-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 66

Reported in : ILR2004KAR50; 2004(1)KarLJ207

ORDER1. R.F.A. No. 318 of 1991 was posted for orders on 27-5-1998 for filing of paper books as well as for furnishing fresh process fee and correct addresses for service of notices upon the respondents. At...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1951

State Through Labour Inspector Vs. M.N. Mehrotra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : State Through Labour Inspector

Respondent : M.N. Mehrotra and ors.

Decided on : Feb-02-1951

Subject : Labour and IndustrialBanking

Acts : Industrial Disputes (Banking and Insurance Companies) Ordinance, 1949 - Rules 5, 6, 81A and 81A(4)

Reported in : AIR1951All623

ORDERDesai, J.1. This is a reference by the Ses. J. of Allahabad recommending that the proceedings pending against the appcts. under Rule 81 (4), Defence of India Rules & various Ordinances be quashed as having abated....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 11 1996

State of Punjab and Others Vs. M/S. Surinder Kumar and Co. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Punjab and Others

Respondent : M/S. Surinder Kumar and Co. and Others

Decided on : Dec-11-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1997SC809; JT1997(1)SC393; (1997)115PLR779; 1997(1)SCALE151; (1997)9SCC66; [1996]Supp9SCR963

1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, dated May 29,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1997

State of Tamil Nadu and Others Vs. M. Natarajan and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Respondent : M. Natarajan and Another

Decided on : Jul-07-1997

Subject : Service Constitution

Reported in : AIR1997SC3120; JT1997(6)SC190; 1997(4)SCALE740; (1997)6SCC415; [1997]Supp1SCR462; 1997(2)LC333(SC)

1. Leave granted. We have heard learned Counsel for both sides.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment and common order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, made on 30.4.1996 in OA Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2003

State Bank of India Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State Bank of India

Respondent : M.C.D. and ors.

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 156 and 157

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)248; 104(2003)DLT363

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Rule. 1. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. It is a classic case of being more loyal than the king....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1997

State (Tamil Nadu) Vs. M. Natarajan

Court : Delhi

Appellant : State (Tamil Nadu)

Respondent : M. Natarajan

Decided on : Jul-07-1997

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 1997RLR495

(1) These appeals arise from the judgment of the T.N. Administrative tribunal, chennai.(2) The admitted facts are that on 10.2.1987. the respondents misbehaved with two ladies and outraged their modesty and took them into the lock...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1939

The Secretary of State for India in Council, Represented by the Collec ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : The Secretary of State for India in Council, Represented by the Collector of North Arcot

Respondent : M.A.C. Arunachala Mudaliar and ors.

Decided on : Jan-06-1939

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1939)2MLJ23

ORDER21. It is now brought to our notice that before the hearing the guardian of minors 5 and 6 was dead. Adjourned one month to appoint a guardian for the minors. The drawing up of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1981

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. K.M. Natarajan

Court : Chennai

Appellant : The State of Tamil Nadu

Respondent : K.M. Natarajan

Decided on : Feb-16-1981

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Sections 7A(1); Kerala General Sales Tax Act - Sections 5A(1)

Reported in : [1981]48STC315(Mad)

Gokulakrishnan, Offg. C.J. 1. The short question that comes up before us is whether there is manufacture as contemplated under section 7-A(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act warranting the levy of purchase tax....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1971

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors. Vs. M/S. Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Respondent : M/S. Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel.

Decided on : Sep-15-1971

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1974)3CTR(SC)134

Hegde, J. - This is an appeal by certificate from the decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The defendant in the suit is the appellant herein. The plaintiff therein is the respondent. The plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial