Advanced Search Results
State of Bihar Vs. Jagdish Sharma and anr.
Patna
State of Bihar
Jagdish Sharma and anr.
Jul-26-2007
Criminal
Madhavendra Saran, J.1. This Government Appeal is against the order and Judgment dated 9.12.1992 passed by Smt. Santoshi Tiga, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Railway, Samastipur in Samastipur R.P.F case No. 10/1985 corresponding to Jr. No. 194/1992...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Jagdish Murav S/O Ramanand, Ganga Murav S/O Kanhai, ... Overruled
Allahabad
State of U.P.
Jagdish Murav S/O Ramanand, Ganga Murav S/O Kanhai, Udaibhan Pandey S/O Vyas Pandey and Ram Sahai Pandey S/O Ram Newaj Pandey
Apr-12-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 34, Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 307
M.C. Jain, J.1. This appeal came to be filed by the State against the judgment and order dated 13.9.2002, passed by Sri Vimal Chandra, Additional Sessions Judge (Court No. 6), Gorakhpur in Sessions Trial No. 483...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmar Singh, Andstate of Rajasthan.Vs. Jagdish and Anr, and State of Ra ...
Supreme Court of India
Amar Singh,state of Rajasthan.
Jagdish and Anr, and State of Rajasthan.
Aug-03-2010
Criminal
Indian Penal Code,(IPC) 1860, Sections 498-A And 304-B; Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32
1.This is an appeal against the judgment dated 07.10.2003 of the High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.816 of 1998. 2. The facts very briefly are that on 05.05.1992 Santosh (the deceased)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Rajasthan Vs. Jagdish Rai Mittal and anr.
Rajasthan
State of Rajasthan
Jagdish Rai Mittal and anr.
Oct-30-2002
Motor Vehicle
2003(2)WLC199; 2003(2)WLN75
N.N. Mathur, J.1. In all these three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India arising from the judgments of the Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal, Jodhpur dated 27.9.1996 and 18.6.1997 the issue involved is whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab and ors. Vs. Jagdish Kaur and ors
Supreme Court of India
State of Punjab and ors.
Jagdish Kaur and ors
Aug-26-2011
Constitution
Punjab Civil Services (General & Common Conditions) Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Article 309
1. These two appeals, at the instance of the State of Punjab and its officials, are directed against orders passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court by which it knocked down the requirement of passing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jagdish Kewat
Madhya Pradesh
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Jagdish Kewat
Sep-20-2013
Criminal
M.Cr.C.No.6707/2011 20.09.13 Per B.D.Rathi,J Shri S.K.Kashyap, Government Advocate for the applicant- State. Heard on admission. This application for grant of leave to appeal has been preferred under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Raj. and ors Vs. Jagdish Chandra Seth
Rajasthan Jodhpur
State of Raj. and ors
Jagdish Chandra Seth
Jul-02-2014
Land Acquisition
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.596/2014 State of Raj. & Ors. vs Jagdish Chandra Seth (alongwith twelve cognate matters) 1 3 to 15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: D.B. Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Jagdish Prasad and anr.
Rajasthan
State of Rajasthan
Jagdish Prasad and anr.
Jul-21-2011
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (NDPS Act) - Section 8 of 20, 8 of 29, 8 of 21
1. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Petitioner has preferred this leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 7th June, 2010 passed by trial court, whereby accused respondent Jagdish Prasad was acquitted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jagdish Kori
Madhya Pradesh
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Jagdish Kori
Sep-25-2013
Education
Misc. Criminal Case No.1745/2012 25.9.2013 Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the applicant-State. Heard on admission. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and Another Vs. Jagdish Chander
Supreme Court of India
State of Haryana and Another
Jagdish Chander
Jan-13-1995
ConstitutionService
Punjab Police Rules - Rules 12 and 21
AIR1995SC984; JT1995(2)SC108; (1996)IILLJ737SC; 1995(1)SCALE378; (1995)2SCC567; [1995]1SCR252; 1995(3)SLJ122(SC); 1995(1)LC512(SC)
1. Leave granted.2. For the disposal of the point in controversy the facts in C.A. No.1088/95 @ SLP (C) No. 9649/93 lie in a short compass are as under:3. The respondent, Jagdish Chander, was appointed as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »