Advanced Search Results
The State of Punjab Vs. Hari Singh and anr.
Supreme Court of India
The State of Punjab
Hari Singh and anr.
Mar-21-1974
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 326
AIR1974SC1168; 1974CriLJ822; (1974)4SCC552; [1974]3SCR725
M.H. Beg, J.1. The State of Punjab has obtained special leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, acquitting the two respondents from charges under Sections 302 and 302/34 Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Hari Singh
Rajasthan
State
Hari Singh
Mar-22-1968
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 423
AIR1969Raj86; 1969CriLJ445
L.S. Mehta, J. 1. In the city of Jodhpur towards the West there is a highway known as Umaid Hospital Road. This road is fed by traffic from the south-eastern feeder roads, namely, Chopasani Road, 5th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Hari Singh
Madhya Pradesh
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Hari Singh
Sep-21-2012
Labour and Industrial
State & ORS.versus Hari Singh W.P.No.10549/2012 21/09/2012 Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners/State. Shri Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent/Workman. Challenging the orders passed by the labour court and the industrial courts, this writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Haryana Vs. Hari Singh
Punjab and Haryana
State of Haryana
Hari Singh
Aug-12-1999
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18
(2000)124PLR177
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The Government of State of Haryana vide notification dated 23.11.1986 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') published on 20.1.1987 in the official gazette, intended to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Hari Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
State of Punjab
Hari Singh and ors.
Feb-16-2009
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 35 and 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 205, 205(1), 233(2), 243(1), 247, 540A, 315, 317, 313 and 313(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342 and 342A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363
AIR2009SC1966; JT2009(3)SC607; (2009)4SCC200:2009AIRSCW1596:2009(3)KCCR1733.
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. The State of Punjab is in appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowing the appeal filed by the present respondents,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Hari Singh
Rajasthan Jodhpur
State
Hari Singh
Nov-01-2012
Education
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER (1) S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 911/2012 The State of Raj. vs. Hari Ram (2) S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 912/2012 The State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Hari Singh
Rajasthan
The State of Rajasthan
Hari Singh
Feb-08-1985
Criminal
1985(1)WLN594
K.S. Lodha, J.1. The learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner, has referred this matter to this Court Under Section 395(2) Cr. P.C. as according to him, a serious question of law arises in the disposal of the bail...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Hari Singh Thakur
Supreme Court of India
State of U.P.
Hari Singh Thakur
Jan-29-1987
Criminal
AIR1987SC2080; 1987CriLJ1923; JT1987(1)SC709; 1987Supp(1)SCC190
ORDERM.P. Thakkar, J.1. While we are not happy with the manner in which the detention order has been quashed, having regard to the fact that about 1 year and nine months have elapsed since the quashing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Hari Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
The State of Haryana and ors.
Hari Singh and ors.
Sep-23-1971
PropertyConstitution
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules, 1949 - Rule 16; East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Punjab General Clauses Act - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
AIR1972P& H328
1. The sole question that arises for determination in this letters patent appeal relates to the interpretation of the expression 'prescribed' as used in Rule 16(ii) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana and anr. Vs. Hari Singh
Punjab and Haryana
State of Haryana and anr.
Hari Singh
May-20-2008
Tenancy
(2008)152PLR370
Ranjit Singh, J.1. State is aggrieved against the order passed by the lower Appellate Court in partly accepting the prayer of the respondent, whereby the order passed by the Trial Court was modified by issuing direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »