Advanced Search Results

State Vs. Hari Shankar

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : State

Respondent : Hari Shankar

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ60

Yashoda Nandan, J.1. The following question has been referred to this Full Bench for its opinion by K. N. Srivastava arid Hari Swarup, JJ:Whether the benefit of the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the...

State of U.P. Vs. Hari Shankar Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : State of U.P.

Respondent : Hari Shankar Agarwal

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ841

H.S. Kapoor, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the State against the order and judgment dated 26-9-1973 of Sri V.K. Malhotra, Magistrate, 1st Class, Agra in Criminal Case No. 396 of 1973 acquitting the respondent...

The State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Hari Shankar Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

Appellant : The State of Bihar and ors.

Respondent : Hari Shankar Prasad and ors.

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J. 1. This is an appeal on behalf of the State of Bihar. At the out set the Court may indicate that regard being had to the aspect and the manner in which...

The U.P. State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Hari Shankar JaIn and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : The U.P. State Electricity Board and anr.

Respondent : Hari Shankar JaIn and ors.

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Section 79(C); Constitution Of India - Articles 133(1), 298, 12, 42, 43; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act - Section 13-B

Reported in : [1978(37)FLR280]; (1978)IILLJ399SC; (1978)4SCC16a; 1978(10)LC659(SC)

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.1. The case is primarily concerned with the age of retirement of two obscure workmen but it raises questions of general importance concerning workmen employed by most statutory bodies and corporations. It is...

State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Dr. Shri Hari Shankar Vaidhya and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Maharashtra and Others

Respondent : Dr. Shri Hari Shankar Vaidhya and Others

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra State Government Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982

Reported in : AIR1997SC3069; JT1997(4)SC702; 1997(3)SCALE677; (1997)9SCC521; [1997]3SCR697

K. Ramaswamy and D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.1. Leave granted. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, made on...

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Hari Shankar Dubey

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : State of U.P. and ors.

Respondent : Hari Shankar Dubey

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC553; (2002)1UPLBEC790

S.K. Sen, C.J.1. We have heard Sri S.K. Mehrotra, learned standing counsel for the State Applicants and Sri V.K. Shukla, learned advocate for the respondent-writ petitioner on the delay condonation petition.2. This is an application for...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Hari Shankar Rajendra Pal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of Rajasthan

Respondent : Hari Shankar Rajendra Pal

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1955 - Rules 30, 19 to 32 and 33 to 42; Constitution of India - Article 226; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1966SC296; [1965]3SCR402

Raghubar Dayal, J.1. This appeal, on certificate granted by the Rajasthan High Court, raisesthe question of the applicability of the provisions of Chapter IV and therebyof r. 30 of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1955,...

State of U.P. Vs. Hari Shankar Tewari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : State of U.P.

Respondent : Hari Shankar Tewari

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1987SC998; 1987CriLJ840; 1987(1)Crimes729(SC); JT1987(1)SC563; 1987(1)SCALE462; (1987)2SCC490; [1987]2SCR426

Ranganath Misra, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court by which it has quashed an order of detention of the respondent made under...