Advanced Search Results

Sham Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Sham Singh and ors.

Respondent : State of Punjab

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B

Reported in : II(1998)DMC174

K.K. Srivastava, J.1. The appellant Sham Singh, his wife Amar Kaur, their younger son Harjit Singh, their married daughter Baljit Kaur, her husband Satnam Singh and Ajinder Singh, the elder son of Sham Singh and husband...

Sham Singh Vs. The State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Sham Singh

Respondent : The State of Haryana

Subject : Criminal

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.544 OF2018Sham Singh ..Appellant Versus The State of Haryana ..Respondent JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and...

Sham Singh and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Appellant : Sham Singh and ors.

Respondent : State and ors.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , Svt. 1989 - Sections 164, 366 and 561

Reported in : 2003(2)JKJ367

B.L. Bhat, J.1. It is reported by the registry that respondent No. 3 caused his appearance in the registry through his counsel Mr. M.R. Qureshi. Today nemo is present on his behalf. This being so, service...

Shyam Singh @sham Babu Singh and Another. Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Shyam Singh @sham Babu Singh and Another.

Respondent : State of Punjab.

Subject : Criminal

CRM not M-32749 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. not M- 32749 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2012. Shyam Singh @Sham Babu Singh and another.....PETITIONER(s) Versus State...

Sham Singh Vs. State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Sham Singh

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 344, 526 and 526(8)

Reported in : AIR1965HP16,1965CriLJ442

ORDEROm Prakash, J.C.1. This is a reference, made by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahasu, Sirmur, Bilaspur and Kinnaur, Sessions Division.2. Sham Singh, petitioner, and others, were proceeded against, under Section 107, Criminal Procedure Code in the...

Sham Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Sham Singh

Respondent : State of Punjab

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1160

ORDERJ.M. Tandon, J.1. Sham Singh son of Pritam Singh stands convicted under Sections 408 and 468, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to five years, rigorous imprisonment, and a fine of Rs. 20,000/- in default of payment...

M. Sham Singh Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : M. Sham Singh

Respondent : State of Mysore

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : AIR1972SC2440; (1973)2SCC303; 1973(5)LC322(SC)

Grover, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Mysore High Court in a suit filed by the State of Mysore against the present appellant for recovery of Rs. 40,000/- together...

Sham Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Sham Singh and ors.

Respondent : State of Haryana and ors.

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2007)147PLR5

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 15959, 15208, 16212, 17297, 15575, 15554, 15640, 17528, 15462, 14923, 14926, 19509, 20148, 20300, 20729, 18219, 18565, 18738, 18919, 18938, 19632, 19935, 19669, 19671, 15229, 16012,...

Sham Chand Singh Munda Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Sham Chand Singh Munda

Respondent : State of Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal(Jail) Appeal (D.B.) No. 25 of 2004 (Against the judgment of conviction dated 22.9.2003 and order of sentence dated 23.9.2003 passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, II,...

Chandra Pal Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Chandra Pal Singh and ors.;sham Sunder Sharma and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.;state of U.P. and ors.

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1985(1)SCALE1317; 1985Supp(1)SCC92

ORDER1. Heard counsel for the parties. Generally the suppositions and propositions given to us by Mr. Gopal Subramanium, counsel for the State of U.P. are acceptable to all the appellants/petitioners excepting a few contentions which, we...