Advanced Search Results
Mohd Shafi vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
Mohd Shafi
State (Nct of Delhi)
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 1067/2016 PRASHANT GUPTA @ RINKU versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2019 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShafi Islam Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Delhi
Shafi Islam
State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Mar-19-2014
Land Acquisition
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 03.2014 Date of Decision:19. 03.2014 + CRL.A. 896/2013 ..... Appellant SATPAL MANN Through: Mr Mukesh Kalia, Adv. versus STATE + ..... Respondent Through: Mr...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohmed Shafi Sardar Patel Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Mohmed Shafi Sardar Patel
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
Aug-11-1994
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304
1994(4)BomCR514
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 25-1-1993 passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 91 of 1992 convicting him under section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd. Shafi and anr. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Shafi and anr.
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Oct-17-1969
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 32; Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1964 - Sections 8(1), 11A, 13(1), 13(2) and 14(2); Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention(Amendment) Act, 1967; Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 11A(1) and 13(2); Defence of India Rules
AIR1970SC688; 1970CriLJ747; (1970)3SCC884
V. Bhargava, J.1. In this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, there are now two petitioners before us Mohd. Shafi and Mohd. Yaqub. Both these petitioners were originally detained under the Defence of India Rules....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.Shafi Abdulla Zuhari @ Muhammed Shafi, vs State of Kerala,
Kerala
Dr.Shafi Abdulla Zuhari @ Muhammed Shafi,
State of Kerala,
Dec-06-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 10078 OF 2023 CRIME NO.929/2023 OF Kunnamangalam Police...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShafi Samuel D.F. @ Shafi Samuel vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Shafi Samuel D.F. @ Shafi Samuel
State of Kerala
May-29-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14860 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SHAFI SAMUEL D.F. @ SHAFI...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShafi vs State of Kerala
Kerala
SHAFI
State of Kerala
Feb-23-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1944 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION & SENTENCE IN S.T. NO.176/2006 DATED 24/07/2014 OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShafi Vs. the State
Allahabad
Shafi
The State
Oct-07-1952
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 32, 252, 286 and 367; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376
AIR1953All502
Kaul, J. 1. Shafi, a young man of 20, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge of Sitapur under Section 376, Penal Code for having committed rape upon Shanti, a girl aged 15 or 16...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammad Shafi Vs. State
Allahabad
Mohammad Shafi
State
Feb-18-1952
Criminal
AIR1952All921
Agarwala, J. 1. This is an application in revision by Mohammad Shafi who has been convicted under Section 4, read with Section 3 of Ordinance 17 (xvn) of 1948--Influx from West Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1948. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Shafi and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Mohammed Shafi and ors.
The State of Rajasthan and ors.
Nov-07-1975
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C, 68D(3) and 68(3A)
AIR1977Raj6
ORDERD.P. Gupta, J.1. These five writ petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common order as common questions of law arise for determination in these cases.2. The challenge in all these writ petitions is with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »