Advanced Search Results

Ambica Steels Limited Through Its Director Shri Mahender Pal Gupta S/O ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Ambica Steels Limited Through Its Director Shri Mahender Pal Gupta S/O Shri Satya Pal Gupta

Respondent : State of U.P. Through Secretary (Tax and Registration), ;commissioner of Trade Tax and Deputy Commis

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)12VST216(All)

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the circular letter dated 28.11.2005 issued by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P., Lucknow, wherein it has been mentioned that, under Section 6A of...

Ambika Steels Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Sri Mahinder Pal Gupta S ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Ambika Steels Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Sri Mahinder Pal Gupta S/O Sri Satya Pal

Respondent : State of Uttar Pradesh Through Institutional Finance Secretary, U.P. Government, ;commissioner of Tr

Subject : Sales Tax/VATCivil

Reported in : (2008)12VST390(All)

Prakash Krishna and Bharati Sapru, JJ.1. All the aforesaid writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed off by a common judgment as jointly agreed by the learned Counsel for the parties. A common question...

Kunti Devi, Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Appellant : Kunti Devi, Mukesh Pal Alias Guddu and Satya Narayan Pal Alias Satya Narayan Rajpali

Respondent : The State of Bihar

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Explosive Substances Act - Sections 4 and 5; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 304B, 307, 324, 406 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 178, 178(1), 220, 220(1), 407 and 407(4)

Navin Sinha, J.1. The petitioners are accused in Khagaul PS Case No. 11 of 2003 registered on 23.2.2003. Cognisance has been taken against them under Section 498A, 304B, 120B and other provisions of the Penal Code....

Satya Pal and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Satya Pal and ors.

Respondent : State of Punjab and ors.

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914; Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956

Reported in : (2000)124PLR559

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The framers of the Constitution considered intoxicating and drugs as injurious to health and impeding the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of the people and improvement of...

Satya Pal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Satya Pal and ors.

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21; Evidence Act; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Court Rules - Rules 1, 2 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 22, 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 41, 154, 154(1), 154(2), 154(3), 156, 157, 157(1), 157(2), 170, 173, 173(2), 194, 195, 301(2), 320, 321 and 438; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 2000CriLJ569

S. Rafat Alam, J. 1. Whether the person lodging a First Information Report (F.I.R;) with police regarding an offence or a crime has to be heard as necessary party before deciding a writ petition by an...

Satya Pal Anand Vs. State of M.P. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Satya Pal Anand

Respondent : State of M.P. and Ors.

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6673 OF2014Satya Pal Anand ... Appellant Versus State of M.P. and Others ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The appellant, a septuagenarian, filed an application dated...

Satya Pal Chopra Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Satya Pal Chopra

Respondent : State and ors.

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Section 63(c); Evidence Act - Section 68

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. This appeal arises...

Satya Pal Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Satya Pal

Respondent : The State of Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25(F)

Reported in : (1997)115PLR328

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The challenge in both these writ petitions is to Annexure P8, the order dated 31.5.1996, vide which the services at the petitioners Satya Pal and Madan Lal respectively were terminated. Satya Pal was...

Present Mr. Satya Pal JaIn Senior Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Present Mr. Satya Pal JaIn Senior Advocate

Respondent : State of Punjab

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Appeal not S-3054-SB o”1. Crl. Appeal not S-3109-SB of 2012 Crl. Appeal not S-3111-SB of 2012 .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not S-3054-SB of 2012 (O&M) Date of...

Satya Pal Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Satya Pal Singh and Others

Respondent : State of U.P. and Others

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3294; [1997(75)FLR328]

O.P. Garg, J.1. With a view to boost the morale and to promote enthusiasm, devotion to duty and by way of incentive to the members of the Police force, the State of U. P. in Home...