Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: satish kumar · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 159 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 19 2009

Sudhir Kumar, Vs. the State of Bihar,

Court : Patna

Appellant : Sudhir Kumar, ;satish Kumar Both Sons of Late Amarnath Prasad and Sunaina Devi, Wife of Late Amarnat

Respondent : The State of Bihar, ;raj Kumar Bhagat, Son of Late Mahavir Bhagat and Anju Kumari, Daughter of Raj K

Decided on : Aug-19-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498(A), 363, 366(A), 376 and 380

ORDERAbhijit Sinha, J.1. This application by three of the F.I.R. named accused of Darbhanga (Town) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2006 is for the quashing of the order dated 10.4.2007 passed therein by the Chief Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2008

Cox India Limited Through Its Director, Sri Rajeev Kumar S/O Sri Satis ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Cox India Limited Through Its Director, Sri Rajeev Kumar S/O Sri Satish Kumar and Sudhir Kumar S/O S

Respondent : The State of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary, Excise Department, U.P. Government, ;The Col

Decided on : Mar-14-2008

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2009(1)ARC39

Sushil Harkauli and Rakesh Sharma, JJ.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the validity of U.P. Excise (Liquor Transit) Rules 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules).2. The facts are that the petitioner being a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2009

Narender, Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Narender, ;usha, ;satish Kumar and Navin

Respondent : State

Decided on : May-15-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Motor Vehicle Act - Sections 133; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 363, 364A, 365 and 368; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 100, 103, 165, 165(1), 165(3), 166, 166(3) and 428

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3613

Aruna Suresh, J.1. The appellants have assailed the judgment and order on conviction dated 29th January, 2001 whereby appellants Navin Kumar and Satish Kumar have been convicted for offence under Section 364-A Indian Penal Code (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 2000

Satish Kumar and ors. Etc. (In Jail) Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Satish Kumar and ors. Etc. (In Jail)

Respondent : State of Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-06-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code - Sections 120-B, 363 and 366; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164 and 313

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4860; 2001(1)WLC299; 2001(1)WLN253

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The above mentioned both appeals are being decided by this common judgment as they have been preferred by the accused appellants against the judgment and order dated 7-8-1999 passed by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2007

Satish Kumar and anr. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Satish Kumar and anr.

Respondent : State of H.P.

Decided on : Jun-01-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3935,2007(3)ShimLC142

Surjit Singh, J.1. Initially, the appeal was filed by two appellants, i.e. Satish Kumar and Shakuntla Devi. Now Shakuntla Devi is dead.2. Appellant Satish Kumar is aggrieved by the judgment of the trial Court (Sessions Court)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2014

Satish Kumar Bhalla Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Satish Kumar Bhalla

Respondent : State

Decided on : Jan-10-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:-03.01.2014. Judgment delivered on 10.01.2014. CRL.A. 99/2007 SATISH KUMAR BHALLA Through versus ..... Appellant Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Adv. STATE Through + ........

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2000

Satish Kumar Goel Vs. State and Others

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Satish Kumar Goel

Respondent : State and Others

Decided on : Feb-04-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)841; 2000CriLJ2177; 84(2000)DLT199; 2000(52)DRJ823

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. This is a writ petition whereby the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to register an FIR in terms of the report/complaint made by the petitioner and for direction to respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2007

Satish Kumar Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Satish Kumar

Respondent : State of H.P.

Decided on : Jan-11-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2244

Surjit Singh, J.1. Through this common judgment, two appeals one filed by Satish Kumar, who has been convicted of offence, under Section 302, I.P.C. and another by Anil alias Neelu, who has been convicted of offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2014

Satish Kumar Gupta and Others Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Appellant : Satish Kumar Gupta and Others

Respondent : The State of Bihar

Decided on : Feb-28-2014

Subject : Criminal

1. Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 503 of 2013 wherein Guddu Rai happens to be the appellant, Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 549 of 2013 wherein Amitabh Rai @ Amitab Kumar @ Amitab Kumar Rai happens to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2018

Satish Kumar vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Satish Kumar

Respondent : The State Govt of Nct of Delhi

Decided on : Jul-12-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : July 12, 2018 + CRL.A. 335/2018 SATISH KUMAR .... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Suraj Parkash Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial