Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: sameer ispat · Respondent: cestat · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.017 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Dec 08 2005

Sameer Ispat Vs. Cestat

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Sameer Ispat

Respondent : Cestat

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(194)ELT26(All)

ORDER1. Heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Aradhana Chauhan, learned Counsel for the Department.2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 5th October 2005 issued on 20th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales