Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: sail · Respondent: cce · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.009 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 2000

Sail Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : Sail

Respondent : Cce

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(74)ECC159

1. The present appeal is against the orders of the Commissioner classifying the "Pitch Creosote Mixture" (PCM) and Road Tar under sub-heading 2708.11 of the schedule to Central Excise Tariff and "Pitch" under 2708.19 and consequent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2001

M/S Sail Vs. Cce, Raipur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : M/S Sail

Respondent : Cce, Raipur

Decided on : Jun-14-2001

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(132)ELT401TriDel

1. Vide the impugned order the Commissioner Central Excise, Raipur has confirmed demand of Rs.46,14,072/- against the appellants on the following grounds:-a) Aluminium ferruls are not inputs Rs. 3,683/-in terms of Rule 57Ab) Chromic acid was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2001

M/S. Sail, Bokaro Steel Plant Vs. Cce, Jsr.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : M/S. Sail, Bokaro Steel Plant

Respondent : Cce, Jsr.

Decided on : Jan-04-2001

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(137)ELT922Tri(Kol.)kata

1. The appellant company is a Public Sector Undertaking. Accordingly, they are required to produce a Certificate of Clearance from the Committee of Sacretaries in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 2001

M/S Sail Vs. Cce, Jsr.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : M/S Sail

Respondent : Cce, Jsr.

Decided on : Jul-18-2001

Subject : Service Tax

1. We have heard Shri S.P.Majumdar, ld.adv. for the appellants and Shri Chaturevedi, ld.SDR for the Revenue.2. Vide their impugned orders, the authorities below have denied the benefit of modvat credit to the appellants in respect...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2001

M/S. Sail Vs. Cce, Jsr

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : M/S. Sail

Respondent : Cce, Jsr

Decided on : May-18-2001

Subject : Service Tax

1. The short issue involved in the present appeal is as regards the availability of modvat credit n the input materials such as caustic Soda, Ferrie Alum, Liquid chlorine and Sulphuric Acid used for purification which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2001

M/S. Sail, Asp, Durgapur Vs. Cce, Bolpur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : M/S. Sail, Asp, Durgapur

Respondent : Cce, Bolpur

Decided on : May-28-2001

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(138)ELT191Tri(Kol.)kata

1. After dispensing with the condition of predeposit of penalty amount of Rs.1 lakh, I take up the appeal itself with the consent of both the sides.The said penalty has been imposed upon the appellant on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2001

M/S Sail (Rourkela Steel Plant) Vs. Cce, Bbsr

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : M/S Sail (Rourkela Steel Plant)

Respondent : Cce, Bbsr

Decided on : Aug-07-2001

Subject : Service Tax

1. Arguing the miscellaneous application counsel for the applicant submits that they have complied with direction of the Committee on Disputes by depositing the requisite amount. He submits that the case may now be listed for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2003

Sail (D.S.P.) Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Appellant : Sail (D.S.P.)

Respondent : Cce

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(89)ECC549

1. Vide the impugned order Commissioner of Central Excise has confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 42.51 crores against the appellant and has imposed identical amount of personal penalty.2. As per facts on record appellants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial