Advanced Search Results

Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation, Bangalore Vs. P.R. Packaging Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation, Bangalore

Respondent : P.R. Packaging Company, Bangalore and ors.

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(12), 45A, 45A(1) and 75(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR936]; 2002(4)KarLJ99

Chindananda Ullal, J.1. This appeal is filed by the ESI Corporation to challenge the order dated 2-4-1997 in ESI Application No. 13 of 1990 passed by the ESI Court, in passing whereof, the said Court while...

A.S. Roderigues Vs. N.P.R.M.P.R.M. Ramasami Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Appellant : A.S. Roderigues

Respondent : N.P.R.M.P.R.M. Ramasami Chettiar and ors.

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1917)32MLJ253

1. This question has been decided in England under the corresponding Section 48 of the Bankruptcy Act of 1883 in 1897 by Vaughan Williams, J., in In re Paine: Ex-parte Read (1897) 1 Q.B. 122 and...

K.P.S. Karuthian Chettiar Vs. R.M.M. Raman Chetti

Court : Chennai

Appellant : K.P.S. Karuthian Chettiar

Respondent : R.M.M. Raman Chetti

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1923)45MLJ844

ORDER1. The application has been made nearly 3 years after the order sought to be appealed against was passed.2. It is contended that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act cannot be applied, because Section 78...

P.L.S.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar Vs. Y.P.R.Y.N.Y. Chidambaram Chettiar a ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : P.L.S.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar

Respondent : Y.P.R.Y.N.Y. Chidambaram Chettiar and ors.

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1938Mad53; (1937)2MLJ737

Abdur Rahman, J.1. The petitioner seeks in this case to revise the orders passed by the District Judge of Ramnad at Madura on 3rd October, 1936, confirming those of Additional Sub-Judge of Devakottai who had permitted...

A.S. Roderiques Vs. N.P.R.M.P.R.M. Ramaswami Chettiar and the Official ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : A.S. Roderiques

Respondent : N.P.R.M.P.R.M. Ramaswami Chettiar and the Official Receiver of Tinnevelly

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1917)ILR40Mad783

1. This question has been decided in England under the corresponding Section 48 of the Bankruptcy Act of 1883 in 1897 by Vaughan Williams, J., in In re Paine: Ex parte Read (1897) 1 Q.B., 122...

S.R.M.M.C.T. Muthiah Chetty and ors. Vs. A.L.V.R. Alagappa Chetty and ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : S.R.M.M.C.T. Muthiah Chetty and ors.

Respondent : A.L.V.R. Alagappa Chetty and ors.

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 47Ind.Cas.296

1. The payment into Court of assets realised and the application for rateable distribution were made on the same day, and the officer distributing the assets should have ascertained which act was prior in point of...

K.P.S. Karuthian Chettiar Vs. R.M.M. Raman Chetty

Court : Chennai

Appellant : K.P.S. Karuthian Chettiar

Respondent : R.M.M. Raman Chetty

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Mad400(1)

ORDER1. The application has been made nearly 3 years after the order sought to be appealed against was passed. It is contended that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act cannot be applied, because Section 78...

S.D. Annamalai Desikar Vs. M.R. Govinda Rao

Court : Chennai

Appellant : S.D. Annamalai Desikar

Respondent : M.R. Govinda Rao

Subject : Miscellaneous

Reported in : AIR1924Mad857

1. The objection is taken that no appeal lies. The order of the Subordinate Judge is one merely ordering notice as required by Rule 3, Order 39. There is no appeal against such an order under...

A.S. Sethurathinammal Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, H.R. and C.E.

Court : Chennai

Appellant : A.S. Sethurathinammal

Respondent : The Deputy Commissioner, H.R. and C.E.

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1996)2MLJ385

ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. The objection taken by the writ petitioner against the notice issued by the respondent under Section 33(3) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 is well founded. It is not...

Re: M/S. Recon Castings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. R.K. Beriwala @ Rajendra Kumar B ...

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Re: M/S. Recon Castings Pvt. Ltd.

Respondent : R.K. Beriwala @ Rajendra Kumar Beriwala, Prop. of Pradyumna Enterprises

Subject : Company

The Court: This winding up application is coming up for final orders after advertisement. At this stage, learned Counsel appearing for the company prays for the discretionary order of permanent stay or dismissal of the winding...