Advanced Search Results
M/S. Peacock Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Peacock Industries Ltd.
C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Jan-13-2001
Land Acquisition
(2002)(148)ELT929TriDel
1. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 22.11.99 passed by the Commissioner (Appeal). In this case, the refund claim filed by the appellants under Rule 173 L was rejected on 8 the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Simplex Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Indore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Simplex Industries Ltd.
C.C.E., Indore
Feb-02-2001
MRTP
1. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the applicants, in spite of notice. Therefore, the stay application, filed by the applicants, is being taken up in the absence of applicants.2. The applicants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. A.B.J. Micro Foams Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. A.B.J. Micro Foams
C.C.E., Jaipur
Apr-17-2001
Land Acquisition
1. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 4,94,382.00 and penalty of Rs. 1,25,000.00.2. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicants, submits that the applicants were manufacturing Hot Rolled Products of Non-alloys...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Mewar Bottling Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Mewar Bottling Co. (P) Ltd.
C.C.E., Jaipur
Apr-18-2001
Service Tax
(2002)(140)ELT237TriDel
1. The appellants filed these appeals against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of aerated water. The excise officers visited the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Rajasthan Cylinders and Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Rajasthan Cylinders and
C.C.E., Jaipur
May-28-2001
Land Acquisition
1. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the benefit of MODVAT credit in respect of steel tubes and pipes was denied to the appellants.2. Brief facts of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Balram Chini Mills Vs. C.C.E., Allahabad
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Balram Chini Mills
C.C.E., Allahabad
Jun-21-2001
Excise
1. The applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand of Rs.2,73,253.50 and penalty of Rs. 2,80,000.00.2. In this case the applicants are engaged in the manufacture of sugar and excisable products i.e....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.B.S. Industries and ors. Vs. C.C.E.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
D.B.S. Industries and ors.
C.C.E.
Apr-02-2004
Service Tax
1. The issue raised in these appeals is common. Therefore, we proceed to dispose of all the appeals under a common order.2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of PP/HDPE fabrics and sacks falling under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskE.S. Levy and ors. Vs. D.E. Ezra and ors.
Kolkata
E.S. Levy and ors.
D.E. Ezra and ors.
Feb-20-1920
Land Acquisition
AIR1921Cal378,62Ind.Cas.199
Asutosh Mookerjee, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit for a mandatory injunction to remove and demolish a wall crested by the defendants. The rights of the parties depend on a consent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Asd Traders Vs. C.C.E.Ands.T., Raipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
M/S. Asd Traders
C.C.E.Ands.T., Raipur
Mar-04-2014
Education
Ashok Jindal, J. 1. The appellant is in appeal along with application for stay. After hearing both the sides, I find that the appeal itself can be disposed of. Therefore, I waive the requirement of pre-deposit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Nectar Life Sciences Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Chandigarh-ii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
M/S. Nectar Life Sciences Ltd.
C.C.E., Chandigarh-ii
Jan-31-2014
Service Tax
Archana Wadhwa, J. 1. Both the appeals are being disposed of by a common order. In Appeal No.2442, duty of Rs.8,00,032/- stands confirmed and in Appeal No.2443, duty of Rs.3,26,904/- stands confirmed by denying the benefit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »