Advanced Search Results
M/S. Peacock Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Peacock Industries Ltd.
C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Jan-13-2001
Land Acquisition
(2002)(148)ELT929TriDel
1. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 22.11.99 passed by the Commissioner (Appeal). In this case, the refund claim filed by the appellants under Rule 173 L was rejected on 8 the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. H.E.C. Ltd., Ranchi Vs. C.C.E., Jamshedpur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
M/S. H.E.C. Ltd., Ranchi
C.C.E., Jamshedpur
Jan-19-2001
Land Acquisition
1. The appellant company is a Public Sector Undertaking. Accordingly, the appellant is required to produce a Certificate of clearance from the Committee of Secretaries in terms of the decisions of the Supreme Court in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Jyoti Weighing Systems Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Bhopal
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Jyoti Weighing Systems Ltd.
C.C.E., Bhopal
Feb-02-2001
Excise
1. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the applicant, in spite of notice. Therefore, the stay application, filed by the applicant, is being taken up in the absence of applicants.2. The applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S. Simplex Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Indore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Simplex Industries Ltd.
C.C.E., Indore
Feb-02-2001
MRTP
1. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the applicants, in spite of notice. Therefore, the stay application, filed by the applicants, is being taken up in the absence of applicants.2. The applicants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Dhanlaxmi Textile Mills and Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Dhanlaxmi Textile Mills and
C.C.E., Jaipur-ii
Mar-07-2001
Excise
2. Both the sides submits that the issued involved in this case is covered by the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sangam Processors Bhilwara Ltd. vs C.C.E. reported in 2001 (127)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Bazpur Coop. Sugar Factory Vs. C.C.E., Merrut-ii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Bazpur Coop. Sugar Factory
C.C.E., Merrut-ii
Mar-15-2001
Right to Information
(2002)(150)ELT133TriDel
1. The matter was earlier called and on the request made on behalf of the ld. counsel, the matter was passed over. The matter was again taken up at the end of the cause list. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. A.B.J. Micro Foams Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. A.B.J. Micro Foams
C.C.E., Jaipur
Apr-17-2001
Land Acquisition
1. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 4,94,382.00 and penalty of Rs. 1,25,000.00.2. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicants, submits that the applicants were manufacturing Hot Rolled Products of Non-alloys...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Mewar Bottling Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Mewar Bottling Co. (P) Ltd.
C.C.E., Jaipur
Apr-18-2001
Service Tax
(2002)(140)ELT237TriDel
1. The appellants filed these appeals against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of aerated water. The excise officers visited the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Rajasthan Cylinders and Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Rajasthan Cylinders and
C.C.E., Jaipur
May-28-2001
Land Acquisition
1. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the benefit of MODVAT credit in respect of steel tubes and pipes was denied to the appellants.2. Brief facts of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Wonderseal Packaging Vs. C.C.E., Nagpur
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
M/S. Wonderseal Packaging
C.C.E., Nagpur
Jun-04-2001
Service Tax
1. The appellants are an SSI Unit manufacturing L.D.P.E. lock bags falling under sub-heading 3923.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They exported these goods and claimed the refund of Rs. 88,291/- and Rs. 98,706/-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »