Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: s s associate · Respondent: m s associate · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2001

S.S. Associate Vs. M.S. Associate

Court : Guwahati

Appellant : S.S. Associate

Respondent : M.S. Associate

Decided on : Apr-04-2001

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104 and 104(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 109 and 109(5); Guahati High Courts Rules - Rule 3

P.G. Agarwal, J.1. In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1/99 and 3/98, vide a common order dated 10.2.99, the matter, regarding maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal against an order of the Single Judge before the Division Bench,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2001

S.S. Associate Vs. M.S. Associate

Court : Guwahati

Appellant : S.S. Associate

Respondent : M.S. Associate

Decided on : Apr-04-2001

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 104 and 104(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1;; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Section 109 and 109(5); ; Guahati High Courts Rules - Rule 3

P.G. Agarwal, J.1. In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1/99 and 3/98, vide a common order dated 10.2.99, the matter, regarding maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal against an order of the Single Judge before the Division Bench,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2013

M/S. Mahavir Lok Chamber Owner’s Welfare Association Vs. M/S. Mah ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Appellant : M/S. Mahavir Lok Chamber Owner’s Welfare Association

Respondent : M/S. Mahavir Associates and Another

Decided on : Apr-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in E.A.87/2008 in CC No.300/2006 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal U/s.27 A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The complainant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 03 2011

M/S Mahavir Associates and Another Vs. M/S Mahavir Lok Chamber Ownerâ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Appellant : M/S Mahavir Associates and Another

Respondent : M/S Mahavir Lok Chamber Owner’s Welfare Association

Decided on : Aug-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. 2. The opposite parties entered into development agreement-cum-GPA dated 16.3.19997 with the President of complainant association for development of property,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2015

M/s Costa Pinto Associates and Another Vs. M/s Ramdeo Maurya and Assoc ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Appellant : M/s Costa Pinto Associates and Another

Respondent : M/s Ramdeo Maurya and Associates

Decided on : Aug-14-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By this appeal, the appellants/original defendants are challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Margao, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 157/2010, on 07.05.2011. The appeal filed by the appellants challenging...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1996

M/S. P.R. Deb and Associates Vs. Sunanda Roy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : M/S. P.R. Deb and Associates ;sunanda Rao

Respondent : Sunanada Roy; M/S. P.R. Deb and Associates

Decided on : Mar-01-1996

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 1996IIAD(SC)535; AIR1996SC1504; JT1996(2)SC684; 1996(4)KarLJ726; (1996)2MLJ3(SC); 1996(2)SCALE551; (1996)4SCC423; [1996]3SCR163; (1997)2MLJ3

ORDER1. Civil Appeal No. 4631A of 1993 is by original defendant to the suit challenging the decree of specific performance which has been passed in appeal by the High Court of Calcutta against the appellant. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial